---------------Process_Step (Brevard):
Process_Description:
Collected future land use maps and/or shapefiles from Brevard County, Cape
Canaveral, Cocoa, Cocoa Beach, Indialantic, Indian Harbor Beach, Malabar,
Melbourne, Melbourne Beach, Melbourne Village, Palm Bay, Palm Shores, Rockledge,
Satellite Beach, Titusville and West Melbourne.
Reprojected data sets into State Plane Florida East NAD 83, feet.
Aligned future land use polygons using parcels file from March 2004 as basemap.
Cut and reclassified right-of-way based on adjacent future land use polygons.
Reclassified future land use polygons based on generalized future land use
categories for Central Florida region.
Process_Contact:
Contact_Information:
Contact_Organization_Primary:
Contact_Organization: East Central Florida Regional Planning Council
Contact_Address:
Address_Type: mailing and physical address
Address:
309 Cranes Roost Blvd. Suite 2000
City: Altamonte Springs
State_or_Province: FL
Postal_Code: 32701
Country: US
Contact_Voice_Telephone: 407.262.7772
Contact_Facsimile_Telephone: 407.262.7788
Hours_of_Service: 8:30 am to 5:00 pm
---------------Process_Step (Brevard):
Process_Description:
UPDATING PROCESS DESCRIPTION
* Original data source: ECFRPC generalized Future Land Use file dated December
2004.
* Update by: (1) GMB Engineers and Planners, Inc. for East Central Florida
Regional Planning Council and (2) ECFRPC staff.
* Update processing time: From May 1, 2005 to September 1, 2005.
* Release date: September 5, 2005.
* Update status: First update of generalized Future Land Use GIS data for
District 5, Florida Department of Transportation. The shapefile name includes
the reference letter A or B corresponding to the first or second release for
data covering the specified calendar year.
* Document sources: All adopted comprehensive plan amendments received by the
ECFRPC from December 1, 2003 to March 31, 2005 for Brevard, Lake, Orange,
Osceola, Seminole and Volusia Counties. _ All adopted comprehensive plan
amendments received by the FDOT District Five planning office from December 1,
2003 to March 31, 2005 for Flagler, Marion and Sumter Counties. Adopted
comprehensive plan amendments found not in compliance by the Florida Department
of Community Affairs (DCA) were not included in the update.
* Processing methodology:
- First step: Major roads, local roads and parcel shape-files were used as
reference points to locate Future Land Use polygons to be amended.
- Second step: Amendment descriptions were used to make changes on the polygons
using snapping and cutting tools available in ArcMap, to match adopted
ordinance. In case of multiple land use changes in one polygon, aerial
photographs were used as visual reference.
- Third step: Attribute table updated with the corresponding Original FLU /
Modified FLU and Generalized FLU information. DCA Number attribute populated
with the corresponding amendment number provided by DCA, when available. Date
Mod field updated with the date of the updating.
- Final step: General QA/QC of both geometry and attributes.
Process_Contact:
Contact_Information:
Contact_Organization_Primary:
Contact_Organization: East Central Florida Regional Planning Council
Contact_Address:
Address_Type: physical address
Address:
631 N. Wymore Rd # 100
City: Maitland
State_or_Province: FL
Postal_Code: 32751
Country: US
Contact_Voice_Telephone: (407) 623-1075
Contact_Facsimile_Telephone: (407) 623-1084
Hours_of_Service: 8:30 am to 5:00 pm
---------------Process_Step (Brevard):
Process_Description:
New Updating Process Steps
Process steps for updating the Generalized FLU file has been modified.
Original file ECFRPC 2005 file.
Using list of adopted amendments from ECFRPC and the comprehensive plans,
updates to the FLU files were made which included polygon manipulation and/or
changing the ORIG, MOD and GEN FLU classifications. The most up to date parcel
layer (2005) were used for reference and snapping.
Once all updates as per adopted comprehensive plan amendments were completed,
the attribute table was QC'ed to ensure all classifications were consistent
based on FLU categories for each jurisdiction. This included ensuring that the
ORIG and MOD flu classifications were correctly spelled and abbreviated and the
correct GEN FLU was assigned for all categories. This was done by <DISSOLVING>
the attribute table based on JURIS, MOD, GEN, and ORIG FLU. Any discrepancies
were checked and corrected. Also, all fields were capitalized.
A query from DCA was obtained which included all adopted FLU amendments for the
9 counties which included jurisdiction, county, DCA number, Date Amendment was
received, number of amendments, large or small scale, notes and acres. Then the
query was compared to the ECFRPC list and the correct DCA numbers were given to
the appropriate ECFRPC numbers which were added to the "DCA Number" field in the
shape file.
Geometry of file was repaired.
---------------Process_Step (Brevard):
Process_Description:
Process steps for updating the Generalized FLU file has been modified.
Original file ECFRPC 2006 file.
Using list of adopted amendments from ECFRPC and the comprehensive plans,
updates to the FLU files were made which included polygon manipulation and/or
changing the ORIG, MOD and GEN FLU classifications. The most up to date parcel
layer (2006) were used for reference and snapping.
Once all updates as per adopted comprehensive plan amendments were completed,
the attribute table was QC'ed to ensure all classifications were consistent
based on FLU categories for each jurisdiction. This included ensuring that the
ORIG and MOD flu classifications were correctly spelled and abbreviated and the
correct GEN FLU was assigned for all categories. This was done by <DISSOLVING>
the attribute table based on JURIS, MOD, GEN, and ORIG FLU. Any discrepancies
(including attribute format and field names) were checked and corrected. Also,
all fields were capitalized.
A query from DCA was obtained which included all adopted FLU amendments for the
9 counties which included jurisdiction, county, DCA number, Date Amendment was
received, number of amendments, large or small scale, notes and acres. Then the
query was compared to the ECFRPC list and the correct DCA numbers were given to
the appropriate ECFRPC numbers which were added to the "DCA Number" field in the
shape file.
The county has released a newly realigned parcel shapefile for 2007. Several
areas will be revisited to align the Future Land Use data with this new parcel
file. However, the FLU classifications are still correct.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation:
K:\PROGRAMS\CFGIS\FLUMs\112005\BREVARD\BrevardCounty_2005_B_Notes.shp.xml
---------------Process_Step (Brevard):
Process_Description:
Updated FLU files, Comp Plan amendments from April 1, 2007 - June 30, 2007.
The updates made to the FLU file included updating of Comprehensive Future
Landuse changes both small and large scale for the relevant time period. A
query was received from DCA that contained all adopted FLU amendments for the
nine counties that were included in this release. The query contained
information about the amendment including Jurisdiction, DCA number, Mod FLU,
County, Date Amendment was received, number of amendments, large or small scale,
and any additional notes.
Brevard County FLU file has also undergone a FLU realignment by the newest
Parcel file available (2007). The realignment began in April 2007 and should be
completed by the end of 2007. The realignment has been conducted by using the
new parcel file to adjust the FLU file.
Amendments that were found Not In Compliance by DCA were not included in this
update.
This file has undergone a QA/QC process that included checking for spelling
errors and ensuring that all relevant files were properly populated. This also
includes checking the abbreviations for the GEN_FLU field.
---------------Process_Step (Brevard):
Process_Description:
Updated FLU files, Comp Plan amendments from June 30, 2007 through October 31,
2007. The updates made to the FLU file included updating of Comprehensive
Future Land use changes both small and large scale for the relevant time period.
A query was received from DCA that contained all adopted FLU amendments for the
six counties that were included in this release. The query contained
information about the amendment including Jurisdiction, DCA number, Mod FLU,
County, Date Amendment was received, number of amendments, large or small scale,
and any additional notes.
Brevard County FLU file has also undergone a FLU realignment by the newest
Parcel file available (2007). The realignment began in April 2007 and should be
completed by the end of 2007. The realignment has been conducted by using the
new parcel file to adjust the FLU file.
Amendments that were found Not In Compliance by DCA were not included in this
update.
This file has undergone a QA/QC process that included checking for spelling
errors and ensuring that all relevant files were properly populated. This also
includes checking the abbreviations for the GEN_FLU field.
---------------Process_Step (Brevard):
Process_Description:
The Future Landuse file has been updated based on received comprehensive plans
with a Notice of Intent received at the East Central Florida Regional Planning
Council between the dates of November 1st through December 31st, 2007 (4Qt).
The changes made to the FLU files include updating both large and small
comprehensive plan changes. Amendments found "Not In Compliance" or not
receiving a notice of intent during the relative time period were not included
in this update. This file has undergone a QA/QC process by the ECFRPC ONLY.
Brevard County FLU has undergone a realignment based on the most recent parcel
file from Brevard County.
---------------Process_Step (Brevard):
Process_Description:
The Future Landuse file has been updated based on received comprehensive plans
with a Notice of Intent received at the East Central Florida Regional Planning
Council between the dates of January 1st through April 1st, 2008 (1Qt). The
changes made to the FLU files include updating both large and small
comprehensive plan changes. Amendments found "Not In Compliance" or not
receiving a notice of intent during the relative time period were not included
in this update. This file has undergone a QA/QC process by the ECFRPC ONLY.
---------------Process_Step (Brevard):
Process_Description:
The Future Landuse file has been updated based on received comprehensive plans
with a Notice of Intent received at the East Central Florida Regional Planning
Council between the dates of April 1st through July 1st, 2008 (2Qt). The
changes made to the FLU files include updating both large and small
comprehensive plan changes. Amendments found "Not In Compliance" or not
receiving a notice of intent during the relative time period were not included
in this update. This file has undergone a QA/QC process by the ECFRPC ONLY.
---------------Process_Step (Brevard):
Process_Description:
The Future Landuse file has been updated based on received comprehensive plans
with a Notice of Intent received at the East Central Florida Regional Planning
Council between the dates of July 1st through December 31st, 2008 (3Qt and 4Qt).
The changes made to the FLU files include updating both large and small
comprehensive plan changes. Amendments found "Not In Compliance" or not
receiving a notice of intent during the relative time period were not included
in this update. One large area was found to be a hole, it was digitized and this
polygon was added back into the file as unknown until further information can be
provided. This file has undergone a QA/QC process by the ECFRPC ONLY.
---------------Process_Step (Brevard):
Process_Description:
Process description: The Future Landuse file has been updated based on received
comprehensive plans with a Notice of Intent received at the East Central Florida
Regional Planning Council between the dates of January 1st through June 31st,
2009 (1Qt and 2Qt). The changes made to the FLU files include updating both
large and small comprehensive plan changes. Amendments found "Not In Compliance"
or not receiving a notice of intent during the relative time period were not
included in this update. One large area was found to be a hole, it was digitized
and this polygon was added back into the file as unknown until further
information can be provided. This file has undergone a QA/QC process by the
ECFRPC ONLY.
---------------Process_Step (Brevard):
Process_Description:
The Future Landuse file has been updated based on received comprehensive plans
with a Notice of Intent received at the East Central Florida Regional Planning
Council between the dates of July 1st through September 30th, 2009 (3Qt). The
changes made to the FLU files include updating both large and small
comprehensive plan changes. Amendments found "Not In Compliance" or not
receiving a notice of intent during the relative time period were not included
in this update. This file has undergone a QA/QC process by the ECFRPC ONLY.
---------------Process_Step (Brevard):
Process_Description:
The Future Landuse file has been updated based on received comprehensive plans
with a Notice of Intent December 31th, 2009 (4Qt). The changes made to the FLU
files include updating both large and small comprehensive plan changes.
Amendments found "Not In Compliance" or not receiving a notice of intent during
the relative time period were not included in this update. This file has
undergone a QA/QC process by the ECFRPC ONLY.
---------------Process_Step (Brevard):
Process_Description:
The Future Landuse file has been updated based on received comprehensive plans
with a Notice of Intent of January 1st, 2010 through March 31th, 2010 (1Qt). The
changes made to the FLU files include updating both large and small
comprehensive plan changes. Amendments found "Not In Compliance" or not
receiving a notice of intent during the relative time period were not included
in this update. This file has undergone a QA/QC process by the ECFRPC ONLY.
Process_Contact:
Contact_Information:
Contact_Organization_Primary:
Contact_Organization: ECFRPC
Contact_Address:
Address_Type: mailing address
Address:
309 Cranes Roost Blvd Suite 2000
City: Altamonte Springs
State_or_Province: Florida
Postal_Code: 32701
Contact_Voice_Telephone: 407.262.7772
---------------Process_Step (Brevard):
Process_Description:
The Future Landuse file has been updated based on received comprehensive plans
with a Notice of Intent of April 1st, 2010 through June 30th, 2010 (2Qt). The
changes made to the FLU files include updating both large and small
comprehensive plan changes. Amendments found "Not In Compliance" or not
receiving a notice of intent during the relative time period were not included
in this update. This file has undergone a QA/QC process by the ECFRPC ONLY. In
total for Brevard County there were 0 large scale amendments and 1 small scale
change.
---------------Process_Step (Brevard):
Process_Description:
The Future Landuse file has been updated based on received comprehensive plans
with a Notice of Intent of July 1st, 2010 through December 31th, 2010 (3Qt &
4Qt). The changes made to the FLU files include updating both large and small
comprehensive plan changes. Amendments found "Not In Compliance" or not
receiving a notice of intent during the relative time period were not included
in this update. This file has undergone a QA/QC process by the ECFRPC ONLY. In
total for Brevard County there were 4 future land use changes by large scale
amendments and 6 small scale change.
---------------Process_Step (Brevard):
Process_Description:
The Future Landuse file has been updated based on received comprehensive plans
with a Notice of Intent of January 1st, 2011 through March 31th, 2011 (1stQt).
The changes made to the FLU files include updating both large and small
comprehensive plan changes. Amendments found "Not In Compliance" or not
receiving a notice of intent during the relative time period were not included
in this update. This file has undergone a QA/QC process by the ECFRPC ONLY. In
total for Brevard County there were 4 future land use changes by large scale
amendments and 1 small scale change.
---------------Process_Step (Brevard):
Process_Description:
The Future Landuse file has been updated based on received comprehensive plans
with a Notice of Intent of April 1st, 2011 through June 30th, 2011 (2ndQt). The
changes made to the FLU files include updating both large and small
comprehensive plan changes. Amendments found "Not In Compliance" or not
receiving a notice of intent during the relative time period were not included
in this update. This file has undergone a QA/QC process by the ECFRPC ONLY. In
total for Brevard County there were 4 future land use changes by large scale
amendments and 0 small scale change.
Process Date:
---------------Process_Step (Flagler):
Process_Description:
Collected future land use maps and/or shapefiles from Flagler County, Flagler
Beach, Beverly Beach, Marineland, Palm Coast and Bunnell.
Reprojected data sets into State Plane Florida East NAD 83, feet.
Created, cut and reclassified right-of-way based on adjacent future land use
polygons.
Reclassified future land use polygons based on generalized future land use
categories for Central Florida region.
Process_Contact:
Contact_Information:
Contact_Organization_Primary:
Contact_Organization: East Central Florida Regional Planning Council
Contact_Address:
Address_Type: mailing and physical address
Address:
309 Cranes Roost Blvd. Suite 2000
City: Altamonte Springs
State_or_Province: FL
Postal_Code: 32701
Country: US
Contact_Voice_Telephone: 407.262.7772
Contact_Facsimile_Telephone: 407.262.7788
Hours_of_Service: 8:30 am to 5:00 pm
---------------Process_Step (Flagler):
Process_Description:
UPDATING PROCESS DESCRIPTION
* Original data source: ECFRPC generalized Future Land Use file dated December
2004.
* Update by: (1) GMB Engineers and Planners, Inc. for East Central Florida
Regional Planning Council and (2) ECFRPC staff.
* Update processing time: From May 1, 2005 to September 1, 2005.
* Release date: September 5, 2005.
* Update status: First update of generalized Future Land Use GIS data for
District 5, Florida Department of Transportation. The shapefile name includes
the reference letter A or B corresponding to the first or second release for
data covering the specified calendar year.
* Document_ sources: All adopted comprehensive plan amendments received by the
ECFRPC from December 1, 2003 to March 31, 2005 for Brevard, Lake, Orange,
Osceola, Seminole and Volusia Counties. _ All adopted comprehensive plan
amendments received by the FDOT District Five planning office from December 1,
2003 to March 31, 2005 for Flagler, Marion and Sumter Counties. Adopted
comprehensive plan amendments found not in compliance by the Florida Department
of Community Affairs (DCA) were not included in the update.
* Processing methodology:
- First step: Major roads, local roads and parcel shape-files were used as _
reference points to locate Future Land Use polygons to be amended.
- Second step: Amendment descriptions were used to make changes on the polygons
using snapping and cutting tools available in ArcMap, to match adopted
ordinance. In case of multiple land use changes in one polygon, aerial
photographs were used as visual reference.
- Third step: Attribute table updated with the corresponding Original FLU /
Modified FLU and Generalized FLU information. DCA Number attribute populated
with the corresponding amendment number provided by DCA, when available. Date
Mod field updated with the date of the updating.
- Final step: General QA/QC of both geometry and attributes.
Process_Contact:
Contact_Information:
Contact_Organization_Primary:
Contact_Organization: East Central Florida Regional Planning Council
Contact_Address:
Address_Type: mailing and physical address
Address:
631 N. Wymore Rd Suite 100
City: Maitland
State_or_Province: FL
Postal_Code: 32751
Country: US
Contact_Voice_Telephone: (407) 623-1075
Contact_Facsimile_Telephone: (407) 623-1084
Hours_of_Service: 8:30 am to 5:00 pm
---------------Process_Step (Flagler):
Process_Description:
Process steps for updating the Generalized FLU file has been modified. Original
file ECFRPC 2006 file. Using list of adopted amendments from ECFRPC and the
comprehensive plans, updates to the FLU files were made which included polygon
manipulation and/or changing the ORIG, MOD and GEN FLU classifications. Most of
the comprehensive plans were obtained from the DCA Florida Papers data
warehouse. The web address is http://dcaenterprise.eoconline.org/. Those FLU
amendments that were not available on this website were obtained directly from
the local jurisdiction. The most up to date parcel layer (2005) was used for
reference and snapping. Once all updates as per adopted comprehensive plan
amendments were completed, the attribute table was QC'ed to ensure all
classifications were consistent based on FLU categories for each jurisdiction.
This included ensuring that the ORIG and MOD flu classifications were correctly
spelled and abbreviated and the correct GEN FLU was assigned for all categories.
This was done by <DISSOLVING> the attribute table based on JURIS, MOD, GEN, and
ORIG FLU. Any discrepancies were checked and corrected. Also, all fields were
capitalized and the DATE_MOD attributes were checked for format consistency.
Where any polygons were not aligned with parcel shapefile, they were reshaped
based on a FLU map received from the planning department of Flagler County used
for reference. A query from DCA was obtained which included all adopted FLU
amendments for the 9 counties which included jurisdiction, county, DCA number,
Date Amendment was received, number of amendments, large or small scale, notes
and acres. Then the query was compared to the ECFRPC list and the correct DCA
numbers were given to the appropriate ECFRPC numbers which were added to the
"DCA Number" field in the shape file.
---------------Process_Step (Flagler):
Process_Description:
Flagler County Future Land Use update. This update is relevant from Apr 1,
2007- June 30, 2007. The file has been updated by using a list of the adopted
amendments from DCA. Only amendments found In Compliance were included in this
update. The most up to date parcel file was used to help in referencing the
parcels that were undergoing a change from the Future Land Use amendment
changes. The jurisdictions were updated separately. All queries received from
DCA for the 9 county area included jurisdiction, Mod FLU, DCA number, number of
amendments, large or small scale, notes and acres for the parcels in question.
A GIS number was added later by the ECFRPC.
---------------Process_Step (Flagler):
Process_Description:
Flagler County Future Land Use update. This update is relevant from June 30,
2007 through December 31, 2007 (3Qt and 4Qt). The file has been updated by
using a list of the adopted amendments from DCA. Only amendments found In
Compliance were included in this update. The most up to date parcel file was
used to help in referencing the parcels that were undergoing a change from the
Future Land Use amendment changes. The jurisdictions were updated separately.
All queries received from DCA for the 9 county area included jurisdiction, Mod
FLU, DCA number, number of amendments, large or small scale, notes and acres for
the parcels in question. A GIS number was added later by the ECFRPC. The City
of BUNNELL FLU map was obtained by the ECFRPC and the area of the city has been
created from the FLUM received.
---------------Process_Step (Flagler):
Process_Description:
Flagler County Future Land Use update. This update is relevant from January 1,
2008 through April 1, 2008 (1Qt). The file has been updated by using a list of
the adopted amendments from DCA. Only amendments found In Compliance were
included in this update. The most up to date parcel file was used to help in
referencing the parcels that were undergoing a change from the Future Land Use
amendment changes. The jurisdictions were updated separately. All queries
received from DCA for the 9 county area included jurisdiction, Mod FLU, DCA
number, number of amendments, large or small scale, notes and acres for the
parcels in question. A GIS number was added later by the ECFRPC.
---------------Process_Step (Flagler):
Process_Description:
Flagler County Future Land Use update. This update is relevant from April 1,
2008 through July 1, 2008 (2Qt). The file has been updated by using a list of
the adopted amendments from DCA. Only amendments found In Compliance were
included in this update. The most up to date parcel file was used to help in
referencing the parcels that were undergoing a change from the Future Land Use
amendment changes. All queries received from DCA included jurisdiction, Mod FLU,
genFLU, DCA number, large or small scale, and the actual land use change. File
was updated Dec 23, 2008. Flagler had empty polygons in areas that were
pertaining to water, as well as overlapping polygons for conservation areas. We
realigned these polygons and digitized new ones for canals and water bodies,
however we may revisit these again in the future.
---------------Process_Step (Flagler):
Process_Description:
Flagler County Future Land Use update. This update is relevant from July 1,
2008 through December 31, 2008 (3Qt and 4Qt). The file has been updated by
using a list of the adopted amendments from DCA. Only amendments found In
Compliance were included in this update. The most up to date parcel file was
used to help in referencing the parcels that were undergoing a change from the
Future Land Use amendment changes. All queries received from DCA included
jurisdiction, Mod FLU, genFLU, DCA number, large or small scale, and the actual
land use change. File was updated in December of 2008. Flagler has a few areas
that may need to be realigned in the future.
---------------Process_Step (Flagler):
Process_Description:
Flagler County Future Land Use update. This update is relevant from January 1,
2009 through June 30, 2009 (1Qt and 2Qt). The file has been updated by using a
list of Notice of Intents from FDOT. Only amendments found In Compliance were
included in this update. The most up to date parcel file was used to help in
referencing the parcels that were undergoing a change from the Future Land Use
amendment changes. All queries received from FDOT included jurisdiction, Mod
FLU, genFLU, DCA number, large scale, and the actual land use change. File was
updated in August of 2009. This update did not include small scale changes as
this data is not available through FDOT. Flagler has a few areas that may need
to be realigned in the future.
---------------Process_Step (Flagler):
Process_Description:
Flagler County Future Land Use update. This update is relevant from July 1,
2009 through September 30, 2009 (3Qt). The file has been updated by using a
list of Notice of Intents from FDOT. Only amendments found In Compliance were
included in this update. The most up to date parcel file was used to help in
referencing the parcels that were undergoing a change from the Future Land Use
amendment changes. All queries received from FDOT included jurisdiction, Mod
FLU, genFLU, DCA number, large scale, and the actual land use change. This
update did not include small scale changes as this data is not available through
FDOT.
---------------Process_Step (Flagler):
Process_Description:
This update is relevant from October 1, 2009 through December 31, 2009 (4Qt).
There were no Notice of Intents from FDOT filed for this time period, thus no
updates were made to this dataset for the relevant time period.
Process_Date: 20100208
Process_Time: 09444600
---------------Process_Step (Flagler):
Process_Description:
This update is relevant from January 1, 2010 through March 31, 2010 (1Qt). There
were no Notice of Intents from FDOT filed for this time period, thus no updates
were made to this dataset for the relevant time period.
Process_Contact:
Contact_Information:
Contact_Organization_Primary:
Contact_Organization: ECFRPC
Contact_Address:
Address_Type: mailing and physical address
Address:
309 Cranes Roost Blvd Suite 2000
City: Altamonte Springs
State_or_Province: Florida
Postal_Code: 32701
Contact_Voice_Telephone: 407.262.7772
---------------Process_Step (Flagler):
Process_Description:
This update is relevant from April 1, 2010 through June 30, 2010 (2Qt). There
were no Notice of Intents from FDOT filed for this time period, thus no updates
were made to this dataset for the relevant time period.
---------------Process_Step (Flagler):
Process_Description:
This update is relevant from July 1, 2010 through December 31, 2010 (3QT & 4QT).
There were no Notice of Intents from FDOT filed for this time period, thus no
updates were made to this dataset for the relevant time period.
---------------Process_Step (Flagler):
Process_Description:
This update is relevant from January 1, 2011 through March 31st, 2011 (1QT).
There were no Notice of Intents from FDOT filed for this time period, thus no
updates were made to this dataset for the relevant time period.
---------------Process_Step (Flagler):
Process_Description:
This update is relevant from April 1, 2011 through June 30st, 2011 (2QT). There
were no Notice of Intents from FDOT filed for this time period, thus no updates
were made to this dataset for the relevant time period.
---------------Process_Step (Flagler):
Process_Description:
Dataset copied.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation:
K:\PROGRAMS\GISWorking\OnGoingProjects\FLU\Flagler_FLU\Working\FlaglerCounty_GEN
FLU_2011_2QT
Process_Date: 20110909
Process_Time: 08491600
---------------Process_Step (Flagler):
Process_Description:
Dataset copied.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation:
Process_Date: 20120103
Process_Time: 15192200
Process Date:
---------------Process_Step (Lake):
Process_Description:
Collected future land use maps and/or shapefiles from Lake County, Astatula,
Clermont, Eustis, Fruitland Park, Groveland, Howey-in-the-Hills, Lady Lake,
Leesburg, Mascotte, Minneola, Montverde, Mount Dora, Tavares and Umatilla.
Used available parcels shapefile as basemap to align future land use shapefile.
Reprojected data sets into State Plane Florida East NAD 83, feet.
Created, cut and reclassified right-of-way based on adjacent future land use
polygons.
Reclassified future land use polygons based on generalized future land use
categories for Central Florida region.
Metadata for ECFRPC LU Project.
Original data source: Downloaded from cfgis.org website, on May 1, 2005.
GIS tasks force: GMB Engineers and Planners, Inc.
For East Central Florida Regional Planning Council
Update processing time: From May 1, 2005 to August 5, 2005.
Release date: August 8, 2005.
Update statues: First update of Future Land Use GIS data for District 5, Florida
Department of Transportation.
Documents sources: All adopted comprehensive plan amendments received by the
ECFRPC from December 1, 2003 to March 31, 2005 for Brevard, Lake, Orange,
Osceola, Seminole and Volusia County. Used all adopted comprehensive plan
amendments received by the FDOT District Five planning office from December 1,
2003 to March 31, 2005 for Flagler, Marion and Sumter County. All comprehensive
plan amendments are in compliance by Florida Department of Community Affairs.
FLU file was updated and completely redone using the Lake County 2007 Parcel
File. Steps of update are listed in Spatial Process Step 6. This new file
update includes the Comprehensive Plan Changes made during April 1, 2007 and
June 30, 2007.
Processing methodology: Used ESRI ArcGIS 9.1 software to update the shapefiles.
First step, major roads, local roads and parcel shape-files were used as a
reference points to locate future land use polygons to be amended. Second step,
amendment descriptions were used to make changes on the polygons using cutting
tool in ArcMap, to match adopted ordinance. In case of multiple land use
changes in one polygon, aerial pictures were used as visual references. Final
step amended polygons were labeled with the corresponding East Central Florida
Planning Council and DCA number, when available.
Process_Contact:
Contact_Information:
Contact_Organization_Primary:
Contact_Organization: East Central Florida Regional Planning Council
Contact_Address:
Address_Type: mailing and physical address
Address:
309 Cranes Roost Blvd. Suite 2000
City: Altamonte Springs
State_or_Province: FL
Postal_Code: 32701
Country: US
Contact_Voice_Telephone: 407.262.7772
Contact_Facsimile_Telephone: 407.262.7788
---------------Process_Step (Lake):
Process_Description:
UPDATING PROCESS DESCRIPTION
* Original data source: ECFRPC generalized Future Land Use file dated December
2004.
* Update by: (1) GMB Engineers and Planners, Inc. for East Central Florida
Regional Planning Council and (2) ECFRPC staff.
* Update processing time: From May 1, 2005 to September 1, 2005.
* Release date: September 5, 2005.
* Update status: First update of generalized Future Land Use GIS data for
District 5, Florida Department of Transportation. The shapefile name includes
the reference letter A or B corresponding to the first or second release for
data covering the specified calendar year.
* Document_ sources: All adopted comprehensive plan amendments received by the
ECFRPC from December 1, 2003 to March 31, 2005 for Brevard, Lake, Orange,
Osceola, Seminole and Volusia Counties. _ All adopted comprehensive plan
amendments received by the FDOT District Five planning office from December 1,
2003 to March 31, 2005 for Flagler, Marion and Sumter Counties. Adopted
comprehensive plan amendments found not in compliance by the Florida Department
of Community Affairs (DCA) were not included in the update.
* Processing methodology:
- First step: Major roads, local roads and parcel shape-files were used as _
reference points to locate Future Land Use polygons to be amended.
- Second step: Amendment descriptions were used to make changes on the polygons
using snapping and cutting tools available in ArcMap, to match adopted
ordinance. In case of multiple land use changes in one polygon, aerial
photographs were used as visual reference.
- Third step: Attribute table updated with the corresponding Original FLU /
Modified FLU and Generalized FLU information. DCA Number attribute populated
with the corresponding amendment number provided by DCA, when available. Date
Mod field updated with the date of the updating.
- Final step: General QA/QC of both geometry and attributes.
---------------Process_Step (Lake):
Process_Description:
New Updating Process Steps
Process steps for updating the Generalized FLU file has been modified.
Original file ECFRPC 2005 file.
Using list of adopted amendments from ECFRPC and the comprehensive plans,
updates to the FLU files were made which included polygon manipulation and/or
changing the ORIG, MOD and GEN FLU classifications. The most up to date parcel
layer (2005) were used for reference and snapping.
Once all updates as per adopted comprehensive plan amendments were completed,
the attribute table was QC'ed to ensure all classifications were consistent
based on FLU categories for each jurisdiction. This included ensuring that the
ORIG and MOD flu classifications were correctly spelled and abbreviated and the
correct GEN FLU was assigned for all categories. This was done by <DISSOLVING>
the attribute table based on JURIS, MOD, GEN, and ORIG FLU. Any discrepancies
were checked and corrected. Also, all fields were capitalized.
A query from DCA was obtained which included all adopted FLU amendments for the
9 counties which included jurisdiction, county, DCA number, Date Amendment was
received, number of amendments, large or small scale, notes and acres. Then the
query was compared to the ECFRPC list and the correct DCA numbers were given to
the appropriate ECFRPC numbers which were added to the "DCA Number" field in the
shape file.
Geometry of file was repaired.
---------------Process_Step (Lake):
Process_Description:
Process steps for updating the Generalized FLU file has been modified.
Original file ECFRPC 2006 file.
Using list of adopted amendments from ECFRPC and the comprehensive plans,
updates to the FLU files were made which included polygon manipulation and/or
changing the ORIG, MOD and GEN FLU classifications. The most up to date parcel
layer (2005) were used for reference and snapping.
Once all updates as per adopted comprehensive plan amendments were completed,
the attribute table was QC'ed to ensure all classifications were consistent
based on FLU categories for each jurisdiction. This included ensuring that the
ORIG and MOD flu classifications were correctly spelled and abbreviated and the
correct GEN FLU was assigned for all categories. This was done by <DISSOLVING>
the attribute table based on JURIS, MOD, GEN, and ORIG FLU. Any discrepancies
were checked and corrected (including the format for the DATE_MOD field). Also,
all fields were capitalized.
A query from DCA was obtained which included all adopted FLU amendments for the
9 counties which included jurisdiction, county, DCA number, Date Amendment was
received, number of amendments, large or small scale, notes and acres. Then the
query was compared to the ECFRPC list and the correct DCA numbers were given to
the appropriate ECFRPC numbers which were added to the "DCA Number" field in the
shape file.
Based on a new parcel shapefile released by the county for 2007, all of the
cities are out of alignment. The county parcels, however, still match up with
this FLU shapefile. To help automate the realignment for the cities, we
developed the following methodology. First, using Arc Map 9.1 we ran a clip on
our FLU file using the updated parcel file. Next, we overplayed the clipped layer
over the original FLU file and selected any polygons that were inadvertently
clipped out from the original layer. Next, we exported these selected polygons
to a new layer. Then, we ran the multipart to single part tool on this new file.
Then we created a field with the same name in both this resulting layer, and the
original clipped layer. The field was called ROW_POLY because many of the lost
polygons were ROW's. This field (in the clipped_export_singlepart layer) was
populated with Y and then this layer was merged with the clipped layer. This
process turned all misaligned polygon areas into slivers in the adjacent parcel.
We then corrected all slivers that were a result of the merge (had a Y
populating the ROW_POLY field). This process was completed for all cities other
than Leesburg. The cities will be revisited to correct the remaining polygons
that are not aligned with the new parcel file.
---------------Process_Step (Lake):
Process_Description:
Lake County Future Landuse file was completely redone using the 2007 parcel file
from Lake County. This file will first be released in the April 2007- June 2007
file release. This process allowed for the County to be completely realigned
and now be based on parcel lines. The process involved the creation of several
new fields including GEN_FLU. These new fields were then populated using the
data available in the new Lake County Parcel file. Most of the changes that
took place were done using the FLU2025 field that was already in the parcel
file. The Wekiva Protection Area and the Green Swamp Protection area were also
added to this file to complete the GEN_FLU categories. Water Bodies were later
added to the file. Once these files had been populated ECFRPC staff used the
crosswalk table to verify and create the GEN_FLU field. All other fields were
populated using the Parcels field or the previous version of the FLU. Although
the previous version was not the base of this file, the process steps and its
metadata are included to help show the steps involved in the process.
The County areas have now been aligned based on the parcel file but the
jurisdictions have not yet been transformed in the same process. The
jurisdictions will begin to undergo changes in the next relevant FLU update
cycle. This is the reason why some of the edges between the county and the
jurisdiction are Unknown and do not properly line up.
After alignment the FLU approved amendment changes were incorporated into the
new aligned file. This update is relevant from Apr 1, 2007- June 30, 2007. The
file has been updated by using a list of the adopted amendments from DCA. Only
amendments found In Compliance were included in this update. The most up to
date parcel file was used to help in referencing the parcels that were
undergoing a change from the Future Land Use amendment changes. The
jurisdictions were updated separately. All queries received from DCA for the 9
county area included jurisdiction, Mod FLU, DCA number, number of amendments,
large or small scale, notes and acres for the parcels in question. A GIS number
was added later by the ECFRPC.
---------------Process_Step (Lake):
Process_Description:
Updated FLU files, Comp Plan amendments from June 30, 2007 through October 31,
2007. The updates made to the FLU file included updating of Comprehensive
Future Land use changes both small and large scale for the relevant time period.
A query was received from DCA that contained all adopted FLU amendments for the
six counties that were included in this release. The query contained
information about the amendment including Jurisdiction, DCA number, Mod FLU,
County, Date Amendment was received, number of amendments, large or small scale,
and any additional notes.
Lake County is still in the process be being updated based on a new parcel file
that was released. The county managed area has been worked in this process, but
the individual jurisdictions are still undergoing the process. Also the Right
of way (roads) for the county have NOT been filled based on adjacent FLU
category.
Amendments that were found Not In Compliance by DCA were not included in this
update.
This file has undergone a QA/QC process that included checking for spelling
errors and ensuring that all relevant files were properly populated. This also
includes checking the abbreviations for the GEN_FLU field.
---------------Process_Step (Lake):
Process_Description:
The future land use file has been updated based on comprehensive plans with a
Notice of Intent received at the East Central Florida Regional Planning Council
between the dates of November 1st through December 31st 2007 (4Qt). The changes
made to the FLU files include updating both large and small scale comprehensive
plan changes. Amendments found "Not In Compliance" or not receiving a notice of
intent during the relative time period were not included in this update. The
Lake County file has undergone a complete parcel restructuring. The Lake County
parcel file was received directly from the county and included all future land
use for the unincorporated areas, this file was updated until early December.
This file served as the base for the ECFRPC to recreate the Future Land Use map
for the county. Future Land Use codes were gained from the county and used to
identify the correct FLU characteristics for the fields. Once populated, the
ECFRPC created fields that allowed for a regional future land use field to be
created. A crosswalk table detailing the characteristics of each field is
available from the RPC. Upon completion of the county file being created, all
jurisdictional FLU files existing in the past release
(LakeCounty_GENFLU_2007_Q2) were added to the file. The ECFRPC is continuing to
process the individual features and will be updating each of the jurisdictions
individually to correct overlaps and any gaps that may be present in the files.
These changes will be reflected in future releases. Water bodies and the Wekiva
River area will also be completed to ensure gaps are corrected in future
updates.
Process_Contact:
Contact_Information:
Contact_Organization_Primary:
Contact_Organization: East Central Florida Regional Planning Council
Contact_Voice_Telephone: 407.623.1075
---------------Process_Step (Lake):
Process_Description:
The future land use file has been updated based on comprehensive plans with a
Notice of Intent received at the East Central Florida Regional Planning Council
between the dates of January 1st through March 31st 2008 (1Qt 2008). The
changes made to the FLU files include updating both large and small scale
comprehensive plan changes. Amendments found "Not In Compliance" or not
receiving a notice of intent during the relative time period were not included
in this update. Lake County has recently undergone parcel realignment. The
parcel file containing the Flu2025 was received from the county. This file
served as the base for the realignment of the Regional FLU file. Lake County
jurisdiction was populated with the values from the parcel file. All comp plans
that received a notice of intent prior to the July of last year were added into
the county file to be sure that no updates were missed. The jurisdictions were
then added as overlay to the file. This process created several overlaps
between discrepancies between the County FLU file and the ECFRPC GENFLU file.
These overlaps that occurred strictly in a county to county level were addressed
first. The jurisdictional update was then conducted. The order in which the
jurisdictions were completed was based on the response order the cities
responded to the data request.
All comprehensive plan updates for Lake County and its jurisdictions that were
newer than the maps or shapefiles sent by the jurisdictions were transferred
into the file here to reflect the most accurate and up to date Future Land Use.
The City of Clermont was the first to respond and subsequently was the first
city updated. The city sent the ECFRPC their FLU shapefiles for the city.
These FLU files were then used to perform an erase from the county FLU file to
create a hole for the jurisdiction to fit into. Once the erase tool had been
completed, the proper fields from the city, which had been populated to include
the local jurisdictions FLU were merged back into the file. Once the files had
been merged, a manual process was conducted by the ECFRPC to remove any
additional lands that had been accidently identified as belonging to the city.
Through this process the city was updated based on the best FLU data available
for Clermont. All situations that occurred outside of the city limit boundaries
identified by the city were replaced by the FLU value from the county
jurisdiction. This shapefile was included in the 2007 4QT. Release. All other
jurisdiction were included in the subsequent release.
The city of Astatula was updated based on a shapefile received from the city.
Certain fields were added by the ECFRPC to allow for inclusion in the regional
file. The file was then erased against the county file that was currently in
place. This created a matching gap for the city which was then plugged into the
gap. All additional parcels outside of the city limits were given the FLU
classification based on the Lake County Parcels file.
The city of Eustis was updated based on a shapefile received from the city.
Certain fields were added by the ECFRPC to allow for inclusion in the regional
file. The file was then erased against the county file that was currently in
place. This created a matching gap for the city which was then plugged into the
gap. All additional parcels outside of the city limits were given the FLU
classification based on the Lake County Parcels file.
The City of Fruitland Park did not have shapefiles available at the time of this
update. The city was able to provide the most recent version of the Future Land
Use map that they had. This map was then georeferenced into the background with
the parcels file overlaid. The FLU classification was then checked against the
cities map to ensure that the FLU for the city matched as close as possible the
FLU classifications in the file. All lands that were outside of the indicated
city boundaries, unless specifically altered by a recent comprehensive plan were
then given the corresponding value of the 2025 Lake County FLU file.
The city of Groveland was updated based on a shapefile received from the city.
Certain fields were added by the ECFRPC to allow for inclusion in the regional
file. The file was then erased against the county file that was currently in
place. This created a matching gap for the city which was then plugged into the
gap. All additional parcels outside of the city limits were given the FLU
classification based on the Lake County Parcels file.
The City of Howey in the Hills did not have shapefiles available at the time of
this update. The city was able to provide the most recent version of the Future
Land Use map that they had. This map was then georeferenced into the background
with the parcels file overlaid. The FLU classification was then checked against
the cities map to ensure that the FLU for the city matched as close as possible
the FLU classifications in the file. All lands that were outside of the
indicated city boundaries, unless specifically altered by a recent comprehensive
plan were then given the corresponding value of the 2025 Lake County FLU file.
The City of Lady Lake did not have shapefiles available at the time of this
update. The city was able to provide the most recent version of the Future Land
Use map that they had. This map was then georeferenced into the background with
the parcels file overlaid. The FLU classification was then checked against the
cities map to ensure that the FLU for the city matched as close as possible the
FLU classifications in the file. All lands that were outside of the indicated
city boundaries, unless specifically altered by a recent comprehensive plan were
then given the corresponding value of the 2025 Lake County FLU file.
The city of Leesburg was updated based on a shapefile received from the city.
Certain fields were added by the ECFRPC to allow for inclusion in the regional
file. The file was then erased against the county file that was currently in
place. This created a matching gap for the city which was then plugged into the
gap. All additional parcels outside of the city limits were given the FLU
classification based on the Lake County Parcels file.
The City of Mascotte did not have shapefiles available at the time of this
update. The city was able to provide the most recent version of the Future Land
Use map that they had. This map was then georeferenced into the background with
the parcels file overlaid. The FLU classification was then checked against the
cities map to ensure that the FLU for the city matched as close as possible the
FLU classifications in the file. All lands that were outside of the indicated
city boundaries, unless specifically altered by a recent comprehensive plan were
then given the corresponding value of the 2025 Lake County FLU file.
The city of Minneola was updated based on a shapefile received from the city.
Certain fields were added by the ECFRPC to allow for inclusion in the regional
file. The file was then erased against the county file that was currently in
place. This created a matching gap for the city which was then plugged into the
gap. All additional parcels outside of the city limits were given the FLU
classification based on the Lake County Parcels file.
The city of Monteverde was updated based on a shapefile received from the city.
Certain fields were added by the ECFRPC to allow for inclusion in the regional
file. The file was then erased against the county file that was currently in
place. This created a matching gap for the city which was then plugged into the
gap. All additional parcels outside of the city limits were given the FLU
classification based on the Lake County Parcels file.
The city of Mount Dora was updated based on a shapefile received from the city.
Certain fields were added by the ECFRPC to allow for inclusion in the regional
file. The file was then erased against the county file that was currently in
place. This created a matching gap for the city which was then plugged into the
gap. All additional parcels outside of the city limits were given the FLU
classification based on the Lake County Parcels file.
The city of Tavares was updated based on a shapefile received from the city.
Certain fields were added by the ECFRPC to allow for inclusion in the regional
file. The file was then erased against the county file that was currently in
place. This created a matching gap for the city which was then plugged into the
gap. All additional parcels outside of the city limits were given the FLU
classification based on the Lake County Parcels file.
The City of Umatilla did not have shapefiles available at the time of this
update. The city was able to provide the most recent version of the Future Land
Use map that they had. This map was then georeferenced into the background with
the parcels file overlaid. The FLU classification was then checked against the
cities map to ensure that the FLU for the city matched as close as possible the
FLU classifications in the file. All lands that were outside of the indicated
city boundaries, unless specifically altered by a recent comprehensive plan were
then given the corresponding value of the 2025 Lake County FLU file.
Upon Completion of the jurisdiction updates. The file underwent a QA/QC process
by the ECFRPC to remove sliver polygons, avoid duplication where possible, and
to check for any additional conflict areas that need to be resolved. Overlaps
occurring within the individual jurisdictions were identified where possible and
cleaned.
---------------Process_Step (Lake):
Process_Description:
The Future Landuse file has been updated based on received comprehensive plans
with a Notice of Intent received at the East Central Florida Regional Planning
Council between the dates of April 1st through July 1st, 2008 (2Qt). The
changes made to the FLU files include updating both large and small
comprehensive plan changes. Amendments found "Not In Compliance" or not
receiving a notice of intent during the relative time period were not included
in this update. This file has undergone a QA/QC process by the ECFRPC ONLY.
---------------Process_Step (Lake):
Process_Description:
The Future Landuse file has been updated based on received comprehensive plans
with a Notice of Intent received at the East Central Florida Regional Planning
Council between the dates of January 1st through March 31st, 2008 (1Qt and 2Qt).
The changes made to the FLU files include updating both large and small
comprehensive plan changes. Amendments found "Not In Compliance" or not
receiving a notice of intent during the relative time period were not included
in this update. A few sliver polygons and gaps were found, these were digitized
and merged back into the file as seen accordingly. This file has undergone a
QA/QC process by the ECFRPC ONLY.
---------------Process_Step (Lake):
Process_Description:
The Future Landuse file has been updated based on received comprehensive plans
with a Notice of Intent received at the East Central Florida Regional Planning
Council between the dates of July 1st through December 31st, 2008 (3Qt and 4Qt).
The changes made to the FLU files include updating both large and small
comprehensive plan changes. Amendments found "Not In Compliance" or not
receiving a notice of intent during the relative time period were not included
in this update. A few sliver polygons and gaps were found, these were digitized
and merged back into the file as seen accordingly. This file has undergone a
QA/QC process by the ECFRPC ONLY.
---------------Process_Step (Lake):
Process_Description:
The Future Landuse file has been updated based on received comprehensive plans
with a Notice of Intent received at the East Central Florida Regional Planning
Council between the dates of January 1st through June 30th, 2009 (1Qt and 2Qt).
The changes made to the FLU files include updating both large and small
comprehensive plan changes. Amendments found "Not In Compliance" or not
receiving a notice of intent during the relative time period were not included
in this update. A few sliver polygons and gaps were found, these were digitized
and merged back into the file as seen accordingly. This file has undergone a
QA/QC process by the ECFRPC ONLY.
---------------Process_Step (Lake):
Process_Description:
The Future Landuse file has been updated based on received comprehensive plans
with a Notice of Intent received at the East Central Florida Regional Planning
Council between the dates of July 1st through September 30th, 2009 (3Qt). The
changes made to the FLU files include updating both large and small
comprehensive plan changes. Amendments found "Not In Compliance" or not
receiving a notice of intent during the relative time period were not included
in this update. This file has undergone a QA/QC process by the ECFRPC ONLY.
---------------Process_Step (Lake):
Process_Description:
The Future Landuse file has been updated based on received comprehensive plans
with a Notice of Intent received at the East Central Florida Regional Planning
Council between the dates of October 1st through December 31th, 2009 (4Qt). The
changes made to the FLU files include updating both large and small
comprehensive plan changes. Amendments found "Not In Compliance" or not
receiving a notice of intent during the relative time period were not included
in this update. This file has undergone a QA/QC process by the ECFRPC ONLY.
---------------Process_Step (Lake):
Process_Description:
The city of Clermont was redone in March 2010 to reflect an updated
comprehensive plan rewrite. Clermont 09-1 was approved by DCA in August of
2009. This comprehensive plan saw a complete rewriting of the future land use
element. This file has been updated based on the FLU file that was received
after contacting the city of Clermont in Feb 2010, the file that was sent from
the city reflects the changes from Clermont 09-1.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation:
K:\PROGRAMS\GISWorking\OnGoingProjects\FLU\LakeCo_FLU\LakeCounty_GENFLU_2009_4qt
Process_Date: 20100308
Process_Time: 12395400
---------------Process_Step (Lake):
Process_Description:
The Future Landuse file has been updated based on received comprehensive plans
with a Notice of Intent received at the East Central Florida Regional Planning
Council between the dates of January 1st through March 31th, 2010 (1Qt). The
changes made to the FLU files include updating both large and small
comprehensive plan changes. Amendments found "Not In Compliance" or not
receiving a notice of intent during the relative time period were not included
in this update. A large scale amendment to the Wekiva Area from 4th quarter 2009
was included in this update resulting in a large number of changes to the file.
There were 5 large scale comprehensive plan changes, 5730 large scale map
changes and 11 small scale changes in this update. This file has undergone a
QA/QC process by the ECFRPC ONLY.
---------------Process_Step (Lake):
Process_Description:
The Future Landuse file has been updated based on received comprehensive plans
with a Notice of Intent received at the East Central Florida Regional Planning
Council between the dates of April 1st through June 30th, 2010 (2Qt). The
changes made to the FLU files include updating both large and small
comprehensive plan changes. Amendments found "Not In Compliance" or not
receiving a notice of intent during the relative time period were not included
in this update. There were 2 large scale comprehensive plan changes and 5 small
scale changes in this update. This file has undergone a QA/QC process by the
ECFRPC ONLY.
---------------Process_Step (Lake):
Process_Description:
The Future Landuse file has been updated based on received comprehensive plans
with a Notice of Intent received at the East Central Florida Regional Planning
Council between the dates of July 1st through December 31th, 2010 (3QT & 4QT).
The changes made to the FLU files include updating both large and small
comprehensive plan changes. Amendments found "Not In Compliance" or not
receiving a notice of intent during the relative time period were not included
in this update. There were 8 large scale comprehensive plan changes and 7 small
scale changes in this update, including a complete FLU change in the city of
Howey-In-the-hills. This file has undergone a QA/QC process by the ECFRPC ONLY.
---------------Process_Step (Lake):
Process_Description:
The Future Landuse file has been updated based on received comprehensive plans
with a Notice of Intent received at the East Central Florida Regional Planning
Council between the dates of January 1st through March 31th, 2011 (1QT). The
changes made to the FLU files include updating both large and small
comprehensive plan changes. Amendments found "Not In Compliance" or not
receiving a notice of intent during the relative time period were not included
in this update. There were 4 large scale comprehensive plan changes and 7 small
scale changes in this update. This file has undergone a QA/QC process by the
ECFRPC ONLY.
---------------Process_Step (Lake):
Process_Description:
The Future Landuse file has been updated based on received comprehensive plans
with a Notice of Intent received at the East Central Florida Regional Planning
Council between the dates of April 1st through June 30th, 2011 (2QT). The
changes made to the FLU files include updating both large and small
comprehensive plan changes. Amendments found "Not In Compliance" or not
receiving a notice of intent during the relative time period were not included
in this update. There were 0 large scale comprehensive plan changes and 0 small
scale changes in this update, resulting in no changes for this amendment cycle.
This file has undergone a QA/QC process by the ECFRPC ONLY.
---------------Process_Step (Lake):
Process_Description:
Dataset copied.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation:
K:\PROGRAMS\GISWorking\OnGoingProjects\FLU\LakeCo_FLU\Working\LakeCounty_GENFLU_
2011_2QT
Process_Date: 20110909
Process_Time: 10235800
---------------Process_Step (Lake):
Process_Description:
Dataset copied.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation:
Process_Date: 20120103
Process_Time: 15262800
Process Date:
---------------Process_Step (Marion):
Process_Description:
For the 2010 1st QT update to the Marion County file has undergone a
realignment. The process began by collecting the most recent parcel file from
the Marion County Property Appraisers Office, which was from 2008, then
collecting the most recent FLU shapefiles from Marion County, the cities of
Belleview, Dunnellon, and Ocala. The cities of McIntosh and Reddick were
received from the Withlacoochee Regional Planning Council in a PDF format. The
parcel file serves as the base and the parcels are filled in with the FLU
designation for the county parcels first. The cities follow. In any instance
where the city and county showed a disagreement about the future land use of a
parcel, the city's future land use was utilized. For future land use
classification that do not follow parcel lines the scale used to cut the shape
of the designation was 1 inch = 0.05 miles. Usually conservation designations,
when necessary aerial imagery and jpg images are used.
The GEN_FLU field is populated based on the generalized future land use
categories for Central Florida region.
Process_Contact:
Contact_Information:
Contact_Organization_Primary:
Contact_Organization: East Central Florida Regional Planning Council
Contact_Address:
Address_Type: mailing and physical address
Address:
309 Cranes Roost Blvd. Suite 2000
City: Altamonte Springs
State_or_Province: FL
Postal_Code: 32701
Country: US
Contact_Voice_Telephone: 407.262.7772
Contact_Facsimile_Telephone: 407.262.7788
---------------Process_Step (Marion):
Process_Description:
The Future Landuse file has been updated based on received comprehensive plans
with a Notice of Intent received at the East Central Florida Regional Planning
Council between the dates of April 1st through June 30th, 2010 (2Qt). The
changes made to the FLU files include updating both large and small
comprehensive plan changes. Amendments found "Not In Compliance" or not
receiving a notice of intent during the relative time period were not included
in this update. There were 0 Large Scale and 0 Small Scale Amendments for this
quarter. This file has undergone a QA/QC process by the ECFRPC ONLY.
---------------Process_Step (Marion):
Process_Description:
The Future Landuse file has been updated based on received comprehensive plans
with a Notice of Intent received at the East Central Florida Regional Planning
Council between the dates of July 1st through December 31st, 2010 (3QT & 4QT).
The changes made to the FLU files include updating both large and small
comprehensive plan changes. Amendments found "Not In Compliance" or not
receiving a notice of intent during the relative time period were not included
in this update. There were 2 Large Scale and 0 Small Scale Amendments for this
quarter. This file has undergone a QA/QC process by the ECFRPC ONLY.
---------------Process_Step (Marion):
Process_Description:
This update is relevant from January 1, 2011 through March 31th, 2011 (1QT).
There were no Notice of Intents from FDOT filed for this time period, thus no
updates were made to this dataset for the relevant time period.
---------------Process_Step (Marion):
Process_Description:
This update is relevant from April 1, 2011 through June 31th, 2011 (2QT). There
were 3 NOI's file in Marion County with only one of the Amendments containing
changed to the Future Land Use element. The single comprehensive plan contained
49 amendments.
Process Date:
---------------Process_Step (Orange):
Process_Description:
For the 2009 4 QT update the Orange County file has undergone a realignment.
The process was initially began by contacting the Orange County Property
Appraiser and receiving the most current parcel file. This parcel file served as
the base for all updates occurring to the future land use map. All values
occurring in the county were then added to the parcel file which had the
additional required fields associated with the ECFRPC regional future land use
field classifications. Once the counties FLU had been added to the parcel file,
each additional jurisdiction in the county was contacted and the most recent
future land use map or shapefiles were sent to the ECFRPC. For consistency the
ECFRPC continued to use the Orange County parcel file as the base and populated
the fields in the parcel file with the information attained from each city. The
ECFRPC then collected future land use maps and/or shapefiles from Orange County,
Apopka, Bay Lake, Belle Isle, Eatoville, Edgewood, Lake Buena Vista, Maitland,
Oakland, Ocoee, Orlando, Windermere, Winter Garden and Winter Park. The future
land use file was then used to populate the parcel file, providing a completed
and consistent future land use file for the county. In any instance where the
city and county showed a disagreement about the future land use of a parcel, the
cities future land use was utilized unless a previous comprehensive plan had
been adopted. For each of the previously noted comprehensive plans that had been
entered by the ECFRPC, the future land for the parcel was compared to the
comprehensive plan and depending on date of last update was changed to reflect
the comprehensive plan change.
The ECFRPC reprojected data sets into State Plane Florida East NAD 83, feet.
Cut and reclassified right-of-way based on adjacent future land use polygons.
For classifications that do not follow parcel lines the scale used to cut the
shape of the designation was 1 inch = 0.05 miles. Usually conservation
designations, when necessary aerial imagery and jpg images are used.
Process_Contact:
Contact_Information:
Contact_Organization_Primary:
Contact_Organization: East Central Florida Regional Planning Council
Contact_Address:
Address_Type: mailing and physical address
Address:
309 Cranes Roost Blvd. Suite 2000
City: Altamonte Springs
State_or_Province: FL
Postal_Code: 32701
Country: US
Contact_Voice_Telephone: 407.262.7772
Contact_Facsimile_Telephone: 407.262.7788
---------------Process_Step (Orange):
Process_Description:
The Future Landuse file has been updated based on received comprehensive plans
with a Notice of Intent received at the East Central Florida Regional Planning
Council between the dates of October 1st through December 31th, 2009 (4Qt). The
changes made to the FLU files include updating both large and small
comprehensive plan changes. Amendments found "Not In Compliance" or not
receiving a notice of intent during the relative time period were not included
in this update. This file has undergone a QA/QC process by the ECFRPC ONLY.
---------------Process_Step (Orange):
Process_Description:
The Future Landuse file has been updated based on received comprehensive plans
with a Notice of Intent received at the East Central Florida Regional Planning
Council between the dates of January 1st through March 31th, 2010 (1Qt). The
changes made to the FLU files include updating both large and small
comprehensive plan changes. Amendments found "Not In Compliance" or not
receiving a notice of intent during the relative time period were not included
in this update. This file has undergone a QA/QC process by the ECFRPC ONLY.
Process_Contact:
Contact_Information:
Contact_Organization_Primary:
Contact_Organization: ECFRPC
Contact_Address:
Address_Type: mailing and physical address
Address:
309 cranes roost Blvd. Suite 2000
City: Altamonte Springs
State_or_Province: Florida
Postal_Code: 32701
Contact_Voice_Telephone: 407.262.7772
---------------Process_Step (Orange):
Process_Description:
The Future Landuse file has been updated based on received comprehensive plans
with a Notice of Intent received at the East Central Florida Regional Planning
Council between the dates of April 1st through June 30th, 2010 (2Qt). The
changes made to the FLU files include updating both large and small
comprehensive plan changes. Amendments found "Not In Compliance" or not
receiving a notice of intent during the relative time period were not included
in this update. For this quarter there were 0 Large Scale Amendments and 7
Small Scale Amendments. This file has undergone a QA/QC process by the ECFRPC
ONLY.
---------------Process_Step (Orange):
Process_Description:
The Future Landuse file has been updated based on received comprehensive plans
with a Notice of Intent received at the East Central Florida Regional Planning
Council between the dates of July 1st through December 31st, 2010 (3Qt & 4Qt).
The changes made to the FLU files include updating both large and small
comprehensive plan changes. Amendments found "Not In Compliance" or not
receiving a notice of intent during the relative time period were not included
in this update. For this quarter there were 58 Large Scale Amendments (Orlando
Amendment contained roughly 50 individual ordinance changes) and 14 Small Scale
Amendments. This file has undergone a QA/QC process by the ECFRPC ONLY.
---------------Process_Step (Orange):
Process_Description:
The Future Landuse file has been updated based on received comprehensive plans
with a Notice of Intent received at the East Central Florida Regional Planning
Council between the dates of January 1st through March 31th, 2011 (1Qt). The
changes made to the FLU files include updating both large and small
comprehensive plan changes. Amendments found "Not In Compliance" or not
receiving a notice of intent during the relative time period were not included
in this update. For this quarter there were 12 Large Scale Amendments and 11
Small Scale Amendments. This file has undergone a QA/QC process by the ECFRPC
ONLY.
---------------Process_Step (Orange):
Process_Description:
The Future Landuse file has been updated based on received comprehensive plans
with a Notice of Intent received at the East Central Florida Regional Planning
Council between the dates of April 1st through June 30th, 2011 (2Qt). The
changes made to the FLU files include updating both large and small
comprehensive plan changes. Amendments found "Not In Compliance" or not
receiving a notice of intent during the relative time period were not included
in this update. For this quarter there were 0 Large Scale Amendments and 1
Small Scale Amendments. This file has undergone a QA/QC process by the ECFRPC
ONLY.
Process Date:
---------------Process_Step (Osceola):
Process_Description:
Collected future land use maps and/or shapefiles from Osceola County, Kissimmee
and St. Cloud.
Reprojected data sets into State Plane Florida East NAD 83, feet.
Aligned future land use polygons using parcels file from March 2004 as basemap.
Created, cut and reclassified right-of-way based on adjacent future land use
polygons.
Reclassified future land use polygons based on generalized future land use
categories for Central Florida region.
Process_Contact:
Contact_Information:
Contact_Organization_Primary:
Contact_Organization: East Central Florida Regional Planning Council
Contact_Address:
Address_Type: mailing and physical address
Address:
309 Cranes Roost Blvd. Suite 2000
City: Altamonte Springs
State_or_Province: FL
Postal_Code: 32701
Country: US
Contact_Voice_Telephone: 407.262.7772
Contact_Facsimile_Telephone: 407.262.7788
---------------Process_Step (Osceola):
Process_Description:
UPDATING PROCESS DESCRIPTION
* Original data source: ECFRPC generalized Future Land Use file dated December
2004.
* Update by: (1) GMB Engineers and Planners, Inc. for East Central Florida
Regional Planning Council and (2) ECFRPC staff.
* Update processing time: From May 1, 2005 to September 1, 2005.
* Release date: September 5, 2005.
* Update status: First update of generalized Future Land Use GIS data for
District 5, Florida Department of Transportation. The shapefile name includes
the reference letter A or B corresponding to the first or second release for
data covering the specified calendar year.
* Document_ sources: All adopted comprehensive plan amendments received by the
ECFRPC from December 1, 2003 to March 31, 2005 for Brevard, Lake, Orange,
Osceola, Seminole and Volusia Counties. _ All adopted comprehensive plan
amendments received by the FDOT District Five planning office from December 1,
2003 to March 31, 2005 for Flagler, Marion and Sumter Counties. Adopted
comprehensive plan amendments found not in compliance by the Florida Department
of Community Affairs (DCA) were not included in the update.
* Processing methodology:
- First step: Major roads, local roads and parcel shape-files were used as _
reference points to locate Future Land Use polygons to be amended.
- Second step: Amendment descriptions were used to make changes on the polygons
using snapping and cutting tools available in ArcMap, to match adopted
ordinance. In case of multiple land use changes in one polygon, aerial
photographs were used as visual reference.
- Third step: Attribute table updated with the corresponding Original FLU /
Modified FLU and Generalized FLU information. DCA Number attribute populated
with the corresponding amendment number provided by DCA, when available. Date
Mod field updated with the date of the updating.
- Final step: General QA/QC of both geometry and attributes.
Process_Contact:
Contact_Information:
Contact_Organization_Primary:
Contact_Organization: East Central Florida Regional Planning Council
Contact_Address:
Address_Type: mailing and physical address
Address:
631 N. Wymore Rd Suite 100
City: Maitland
State_or_Province: FL
Postal_Code: 32751
Country: US
Contact_Voice_Telephone: (407) 623-1075
Contact_Facsimile_Telephone: (407) 623-1084
Hours_of_Service: 8:30 am to 5:00 pm
---------------Process_Step (Osceola):
Process_Description:
New Updating Process Steps
Process steps for updating the Generalized FLU file has been modified.
Original file ECFRPC 2005 file.
Using list of adopted amendments from ECFRPC and the comprehensive plans,
updates to the FLU files were made which included polygon manipulation and/or
changing the ORIG, MOD and GEN FLU classifications. The most up to date parcel
layer (2005) were used for reference and snapping.
Once all updates as per adopted comprehensive plan amendments were completed,
the attribute table was QC'ed to ensure all classifications were consistent
based on FLU categories for each jurisdiction. This included ensuring that the
ORIG and MOD flu classifications were correctly spelled and abbreviated and the
correct GEN FLU was assigned for all categories. This was done by <DISSOLVING>
the attribute table based on JURIS, MOD, GEN, and ORIG FLU. Any discrepancies
were checked and corrected. Also, all fields were capitalized.
A query from DCA was obtained which included all adopted FLU amendments for the
9 counties which included jurisdiction, county, DCA number, Date Amendment was
received, number of amendments, large or small scale, notes and acres. Then the
query was compared to the ECFRPC list and the correct DCA numbers were given to
the appropriate ECFRPC numbers which were added to the "DCA Number" field in the
shape file.
Geometry of file was repaired.
---------------Process_Step (Osceola):
Process_Description:
Process steps for updating the Generalized FLU file has been modified.
Original file ECFRPC 2006 file.
Using list of adopted amendments from ECFRPC and the comprehensive plans,
updates to the FLU files were made which included polygon manipulation and/or
changing the ORIG, MOD and GEN FLU classifications. The most up to date parcel
layer (2005) was used for reference and snapping.
Once all updates as per adopted comprehensive plan amendments were completed,
the attribute table was QC'ed to ensure all classifications were consistent
based on FLU categories for each jurisdiction. This included ensuring that the
ORIG and MOD flu classifications were correctly spelled and abbreviated and the
correct GEN FLU was assigned for all categories. This was done by <DISSOLVING>
the attribute table based on JURIS, MOD, GEN, and ORIG FLU. Any discrepancies
were checked and corrected. Also, all fields were capitalized and the DATE_MOD
attributes were checked for format consistency.
A query from DCA was obtained which included all adopted FLU amendments for the
9 counties which included jurisdiction, county, DCA number, Date Amendment was
received, number of amendments, large or small scale, notes and acres. Then the
query was compared to the ECFRPC list and the correct DCA numbers were given to
the appropriate ECFRPC numbers which were added to the "DCA Number" field in the
shape file.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation:
C:\DOCUME~1\claudia\LOCALS~1\Temp\xml8.tmp
---------------Process_Step (Osceola):
Process_Description:
This update is relevant from Apr 1, 2007- June 30, 2007. The file has been
updated by using a list of the adopted amendments from DCA. Only amendments
found In Compliance were included in this update. The most up to date parcel
file was used to help in referencing the parcels that were undergoing a change
from the Future Land Use amendment changes. The jurisdictions were updated
separately. All queries received from DCA for the 9 county area included
jurisdiction, Mod FLU, DCA number, number of amendments, large or small scale,
notes and acres for the parcels in question. A GIS number was added later by
the ECFRPC.
---------------Process_Step (Osceola):
Process_Description:
Updated FLU files, Comp Plan amendments from June 30, 2007 through October 31,
2007. The updates made to the FLU file included updating of Comprehensive
Future Land use changes both small and large scale for the relevant time period.
A query was received from DCA that contained all adopted FLU amendments for the
six counties that were included in this release. The query contained
information about the amendment including Jurisdiction, DCA number, Mod FLU,
County, Date Amendment was received, number of amendments, large or small scale,
and any additional notes.
Amendments that were found Not In Compliance by DCA were not included in this
update.
This file has undergone a QA/QC process that included checking for spelling
errors and ensuring that all relevant files were properly populated. This also
includes checking the abbreviations for the GEN_FLU field.
---------------Process_Step (Osceola):
Process_Description:
The Future Landuse file has been updated based on received comprehensive plans
with a Notice of Intent received at the East Central Florida Regional Planning
Council between the dates of November 1st through December 31st, 2007 (4Qt).
The changes made to the FLU files include updating both large and small
comprehensive plan changes. Amendments found "Not In Compliance" or not
receiving a notice of intent during the relative time period were not included
in this update. This file has undergone a QA/QC process by the ECFRPC.
There was no comprehensive plans included in this update in either the small or
large scale category.
---------------Process_Step (Osceola):
Process_Description:
The Future Landuse file has been updated based on received comprehensive plans
with a Notice of Intent received at the East Central Florida Regional Planning
Council between the dates of January 1st through April 1st, 2008 (1Qt). The
changes made to the FLU files include updating both large and small
comprehensive plan changes. Amendments found "Not In Compliance" or not
receiving a notice of intent during the relative time period were not included
in this update. This file has undergone a QA/QC process by the ECFRPC.
---------------Process_Step (Osceola):
Process_Description:
The Future Landuse file has been updated based on received comprehensive plans
with a Notice of Intent received at the East Central Florida Regional Planning
Council between the dates of April 1st through July 1st, 2008 (2Qt). The
changes made to the FLU files include updating both large and small
comprehensive plan changes. Amendments found "Not In Compliance" or not
receiving a notice of intent during the relative time period were not included
in this update. This file has undergone a QA/QC process by the ECFRPC ONLY.
---------------Process_Step (Osceola):
Process_Description:
The Future Landuse file has been updated based on received comprehensive plans
with a Notice of Intent received at the East Central Florida Regional Planning
Council between the dates of July 1st, 2008 to December 31st(3Qt to 4Qt). The
changes made to the FLU files include updating both large and small
comprehensive plan changes. This file has undergone a QA/QC process by the
ECFRPC ONLY.
---------------Process_Step (Osceola):
Process_Description:
Osceola County FLU file Updated based on 2008 Osceola County Property Appraiser
Parcel File.
At the start of the 2009 year, the East Central Florida Regional Planning
Council identified Osceola County as the next county to undergo FLU realignment
and data collection. The ECFRPC determined to use the Parcel file received from
the Osceola County Property Appraiser as the base for the update. The ECFRPC
then contacted all jurisdictions within the county to obtain a copy of the most
recent Future Land Use Map or GIS shapefile. Osceola County, City of Kissimmee,
and City of St Cloud all supplied GIS format shapefiles of the FLU for their
respective cities. A PDF map document of the Reedy Creek Improvement District
was downloaded via their website. The ECFRPC began started the process with the
Counties Future Land Use file. A select by attributes followed by a select by
location was used to select parcels whose centroids were present within the FLU
file provided by the county and the parcel was given the corresponding FLU
classification. Each FLU category was completed independently and was
individually checked to ensure that parcels were correctly selected. Split
parcels or parcels needing to be "cut" were then edited to reflect the county
FLU categories. The fields were populated by the ECFRPC through the use of a
crosswalk table, allowing for the completion of the regional FLU field. This
same process was used for both the city of Kissimmee and the city of St. Cloud,
in cases where there was a conflict between the city and county on the FLU
category, priority was given to the city. The ECFRPC utilized aerial
photographs, past FLU files, and parcel data to help accurately select the
parcels that should be given the FLU category. In the case of the Reedy Creek
Improvement District, the FLUM was georeferenced and parcels were selected based
on the PDF image. Upon completion of the parcel identification for Future Land
Use, the ECFRPC then added in the missing ROW and Water Body polygons to
complete a uniform FLU polygon for the county. The Water bodies and ROW were
then checked by the ECFRPC and cuts/splits were made based on Aerial Photographs
and past data. The ECFRPC then performed a clean on the file to remove any
sliver polygons and to dissolve the parcels sharing similar FLU categories
together.
---------------Process_Step (Osceola):
Process_Description:
Osceola County Future Land Use 2009 1st and 2nd Quarter Updating. The ECFPRC
received a complete list of all comprehensive plans with a letter of Intent from
DCA, that have been approved. The comprehensive plans were then checked on a
parcel by parcel basis and future land use changed where indicated in the
comprehensive plan amendment document. The changes were made by utilizing
aerial photographs, parcel lines, and when needed past FLU files. The FLU file
has undergone a QA/QC process by the ECFRPC only.
---------------Process_Step (Osceola):
Process_Description:
Osceola County Future Land Use 2009 3rd Quarter Updating. The ECFPRC received a
complete list of all comprehensive plans with a letter of Intent from DCA, that
have been approved. The comprehensive plans were then checked on a parcel by
parcel basis and future land use changed where indicated in the comprehensive
plan amendment document. The changes were made by utilizing aerial photographs,
parcel lines, and when needed past FLU files. The FLU file has undergone a
QA/QC process by the ECFRPC only.
---------------Process_Step (Osceola):
Process_Description:
The Future Landuse file has been updated based on received comprehensive plans
with a Notice of Intent received at the East Central Florida Regional Planning
Council between the dates of October 1st through December 31th, 2009 (4Qt). The
changes made to the FLU files include updating both large and small
comprehensive plan changes. Amendments found "Not In Compliance" or not
receiving a notice of intent during the relative time period were not included
in this update. This file has undergone a QA/QC process by the ECFRPC ONLY.
---------------Process_Step (Osceola):
Process_Description:
The Future Landuse file has been updated based on received comprehensive plans
with a Notice of Intent received at the East Central Florida Regional Planning
Council between the dates of January 1st through March 31th, 2010 (1Qt). The
changes made to the FLU files include updating both large and small
comprehensive plan changes. Amendments found "Not In Compliance" or not
receiving a notice of intent during the relative time period were not included
in this update. This file has undergone a QA/QC process by the ECFRPC ONLY.
Process_Contact:
Contact_Information:
Contact_Organization_Primary:
Contact_Organization: ECFRPC
Contact_Address:
Address_Type: mailing and physical address
Address:
309 Cranes Roost Blvd Suite 2000
City: Altamonte Springs
State_or_Province: Florida
Postal_Code: 32701
Contact_Voice_Telephone: 407.262.7772
---------------Process_Step (Osceola):
Process_Description:
The Future Landuse file has been updated based on received comprehensive plans
with a Notice of Intent received at the East Central Florida Regional Planning
Council between the dates of April 1st through June 30th, 2010 (2Qt). The
changes made to the FLU files include updating both large and small
comprehensive plan changes. Amendments found "Not In Compliance" or not
receiving a notice of intent during the relative time period were not included
in this update. This update includes 1 Large Scale Amendment and 1 Small Scale
Amendment Change. This file has undergone a QA/QC process by the ECFRPC ONLY.
---------------Process_Step (Osceola):
Process_Description:
The Future Landuse file has been updated based on received comprehensive plans
with a Notice of Intent received at the East Central Florida Regional Planning
Council between the dates of July 1st through December 31st, 2010 (3QT & 4QT).
The changes made to the FLU files include updating both large and small
comprehensive plan changes. Amendments found "Not In Compliance" or not
receiving a notice of intent during the relative time period were not included
in this update. This update includes 1 Large Scale Amendment and 2 Small Scale
Amendment Change. This file has undergone a QA/QC process by the ECFRPC ONLY.
---------------Process_Step (Osceola):
Process_Description:
The Future Landuse file has been updated based on received comprehensive plans
with a Notice of Intent received at the East Central Florida Regional Planning
Council between the dates of January 1st through March 31th, 2011 (1stQT). The
changes made to the FLU files include updating both large and small
comprehensive plan changes. Amendments found "Not In Compliance" or not
receiving a notice of intent during the relative time period were not included
in this update. This update includes 0 Large Scale Amendment and 5 Small Scale
Amendment Change. This file has undergone a QA/QC process by the ECFRPC ONLY.
---------------Process_Step (Osceola):
Process_Description:
The Future Landuse file has been updated based on received comprehensive plans
with a Notice of Intent received at the East Central Florida Regional Planning
Council between the dates of April 1st through June 30th, 2011 (2QT). The
changes made to the FLU files include updating both large and small
comprehensive plan changes. Amendments found "Not In Compliance" or not
receiving a notice of intent during the relative time period were not included
in this update. There were 0 large scale comprehensive plan changes and 0 small
scale changes in this update, resulting in no changes for this amendment cycle.
This file has undergone a QA/QC process by the ECFRPC ONLY.
Process Date:
---------------Process_Step (Seminole):
Process_Description:
Collected future land use maps and/or shapefiles from Seminole County, Altamonte
Springs, Casselberry, Lake Mary, Longwood, Oviedo, Sanford and Winter Springs.
Reprojected data sets into State Plane Florida East NAD 83, feet.
Aligned future land use polygons using parcels file from January 2004 as
basemap.
Created, cut and reclassified right-of-way based on adjacent future land use
polygons.
Reclassified future land use polygons based on generalized future land use
categories for Central Florida region.
Process_Contact:
Contact_Information:
Contact_Organization_Primary:
Contact_Organization: East Central Florida Regional Planning Council
Contact_Address:
Address_Type: mailing and physical address
Address:
309 Cranes Roost Blvd. Suite 2000
City: Altamonte Springs
State_or_Province: FL
Postal_Code: 32701
Country: US
Contact_Voice_Telephone: 407.262.7772
Contact_Facsimile_Telephone: 407.262.7788
---------------Process_Step (Seminole):
Process_Description:
UPDATING PROCESS DESCRIPTION
* Original data source: ECFRPC generalized Future Land Use file dated December
2004.
* Update by: (1) GMB Engineers and Planners, Inc. for East Central Florida
Regional Planning Council and (2) ECFRPC staff.
* Update processing time: From May 1, 2005 to September 1, 2005.
* Release date: September 5, 2005.
* Update status: First update of generalized Future Land Use GIS data for
District 5, Florida Department of Transportation. The shapefile name includes
the reference letter A or B corresponding to the first or second release for
data covering the specified calendar year.
* Document_ sources: All adopted comprehensive plan amendments received by the
ECFRPC from December 1, 2003 to March 31, 2005 for Brevard, Lake, Orange,
Osceola, Seminole and Volusia Counties. _ All adopted comprehensive plan
amendments received by the FDOT District Five planning office from December 1,
2003 to March 31, 2005 for Flagler, Marion and Sumter Counties. Adopted
comprehensive plan amendments found not in compliance by the Florida Department
of Community Affairs (DCA) were not included in the update.
* Processing methodology:
- First step: Major roads, local roads and parcel shape-files were used as _
reference points to locate Future Land Use polygons to be amended.
- Second step: Amendment descriptions were used to make changes on the
polygons using snapping and cutting tools available in ArcMap, to match adopted
ordinance. In case of multiple land use changes in one polygon, aerial
photographs were used as visual reference.
- Third step: Attribute table updated with the corresponding Original FLU /
Modified FLU and Generalized FLU information. DCA Number attribute populated
with the corresponding amendment number provided by DCA, when available. Date
Mod field updated with the date of the updating.
- Final step: General QA/QC of both geometry and attributes.
Process_Contact:
Contact_Information:
Contact_Organization_Primary:
Contact_Organization: East Central Florida Regional Planning Council
Contact_Address:
Address_Type: mailing and physical address
Address:
631 N. Wymore Rd Suite 100
City: Maitland
State_or_Province: FL
Postal_Code: 32751
Country: US
Contact_Voice_Telephone: (407) 623-1075
Contact_Facsimile_Telephone: (407) 623-1084
Hours_of_Service: 8:30 am to 5:00 pm
---------------Process_Step (Seminole):
Process_Description:
New Updating Process Steps
Process steps for updating the Generalized FLU file has been modified.
Original file ECFRPC 2005 file.
Using list of adopted amendments from ECFRPC and the comprehensive plans,
updates to the FLU files were made which included polygon manipulation and/or
changing the ORIG, MOD and GEN FLU classifications. The most up to date parcel
layer (2005) were used for reference and snapping.
Once all updates as per adopted comprehensive plan amendments were completed,
the attribute table was QC'ed to ensure all classifications were consistent
based on FLU categories for each jurisdiction. This included ensuring that the
ORIG and MOD flu classifications were correctly spelled and abbreviated and the
correct GEN FLU was assigned for all categories. This was done by <DISSOLVING>
the attribute table based on JURIS, MOD, GEN, and ORIG FLU. Any discrepancies
were checked and corrected. Also, all fields were capitalized.
A query from DCA was obtained which included all adopted FLU amendments for the
9 counties which included jurisdiction, county, DCA number, Date Amendment was
received, number of amendments, large or small scale, notes and acres. Then the
query was compared to the ECFRPC list and the correct DCA numbers were given to
the appropriate ECFRPC numbers which were added to the "DCA Number" field in the
shape file.
Geometry of file was repaired.
---------------Process_Step (Seminole):
Process_Description:
Process steps for updating the Generalized FLU file has been modified.
Original file ECFRPC 2006 file.
Using list of adopted amendments from ECFRPC and the comprehensive plans,
updates to the FLU files were made which included polygon manipulation and/or
changing the ORIG, MOD and GEN FLU classifications. The most up to date parcel
layer (2005) was used for reference and snapping.
Once all updates as per adopted comprehensive plan amendments were completed,
the attribute table was QC'ed to ensure all classifications were consistent
based on FLU categories for each jurisdiction. This included ensuring that the
ORIG and MOD flu classifications were correctly spelled and abbreviated and the
correct GEN FLU was assigned for all categories. This was done by <DISSOLVING>
the attribute table based on JURIS, MOD, GEN, and ORIG FLU. Any discrepancies
were checked and corrected. Also, all fields were capitalized and the DATE_MOD
attributes were checked for format consistency.
A query from DCA was obtained which included all adopted FLU amendments for the
9 counties which included jurisdiction, county, DCA number, Date Amendment was
received, number of amendments, large or small scale, notes and acres. Then the
query was compared to the ECFRPC list and the correct DCA numbers were given to
the appropriate ECFRPC numbers which were added to the "DCA Number" field in the
shape file.
We are awaiting a reengineered parcel shapefile for Seminole County. Upon
reception of said file we will be realigning several areas to assure that there
is alignment with this FLU shapefile to within two feet of accuracy.
---------------Process_Step (Seminole):
Process_Description:
This update is relevant from Apr 1, 2007- June 30, 2007. The file has been
updated by using a list of the adopted amendments from DCA. Only amendments
found In Compliance were included in this update. The most up to date parcel
file was used to help in referencing the parcels that were undergoing a change
from the Future Land Use amendment changes. The jurisdictions were updated
separately. All queries received from DCA for the 9 county area included
jurisdiction, Mod FLU, DCA number, number of amendments, large or small scale,
notes and acres for the parcels in question. A GIS number was added later by
the ECFRPC.
Seminole County recently redrew there parcel lines. The updates that were
completed in this series base the FLU changes on these new parcel lines, However
because of the redraw of the counties parcels, if the most recent parcel file is
used (2007) the county FLU file will appear to have shifted. The realignment of
Seminole County will not occur until the county has been able to successfully
change all of their files to reflect this new change. Using the Seminole County
parcel file from 2005 or older will allow for the FLU files to align properly
with the parcel files.
---------------Process_Step (Seminole):
Process_Description:
Updated FLU files, Comp Plan amendments from June 30, 2007 through October 31,
2007. The updates made to the FLU file included updating of Comprehensive
Future Land use changes both small and large scale for the relevant time period.
A query was received from DCA that contained all adopted FLU amendments for the
six counties that were included in this release. The query contained
information about the amendment including Jurisdiction, DCA number, Mod FLU,
County, Date Amendment was received, number of amendments, large or small scale,
and any additional notes.
Amendments that were found Not In Compliance by DCA were not included in this
update.
This file has undergone a QA/QC process that included checking for spelling
errors and ensuring that all relevant files were properly populated. This also
includes checking the abbreviations for the GEN_FLU field.
---------------Process_Step (Seminole):
Process_Description:
The Future Landuse file has been updated based on received comprehensive plans
with a Notice of Intent received at the East Central Florida Regional Planning
Council between the dates of November 1st through December 31st, 2007 (4Qt).
The changes made to the FLU files include updating both large and small
comprehensive plan changes. Amendments found "Not In Compliance" or not
receiving a notice of intent during the relative time period were not included
in this update. This file has undergone a QA/QC process by the ECFRPC.
---------------Process_Step (Seminole):
Process_Description:
The Future Landuse file has been updated based on received comprehensive plans
with a Notice of Intent received at the East Central Florida Regional Planning
Council between the dates of January 1st through April 1st, 2008 (1Qt). The
changes made to the FLU files include updating both large and small
comprehensive plan changes. Amendments found "Not In Compliance" or not
receiving a notice of intent during the relative time period were not included
in this update. This file has undergone a QA/QC process by the ECFRPC.
---------------Process_Step (Seminole):
Process_Description:
The Future Landuse file has been updated based on received comprehensive plans
with a Notice of Intent received at the East Central Florida Regional Planning
Council between the dates of April 1st through July 1st, 2008 (1Qt). The
changes made to the FLU files include updating both large and small
comprehensive plan changes. Amendments found "Not In Compliance" or not
receiving a notice of intent during the relative time period were not included
in this update. This file has undergone a QA/QC process by the ECFRPC.
This Future Land Use file has undergone a complete parcel realignment during
this update process. The process was initially began by contacting the Seminole
County GIS department and receiving the most current parcel file (Jan 2008).
This parcel file served as the base for all updates occurring to the future land
use map. Seminole County GIS then provided the FLU file for the entire county.
All values occurring in the county were then added to the parcel file which had
the additional required fields associated with the ECFRPC regional future land
use field classifications. Once the counties FLU had been added to the parcel
file, each additional jurisdiction in the county was contacted and the most
recent future land use map or shapefiles were sent to the ECFRPC. For
consistency the ECFRPC continued to use the Seminole County parcel file as the
base and populated the fields in the parcel file with the information attained
from each city. Altamonte Springs, Lake Mary, Longwood, Oviedo, Sanford, and
Winter Springs all provided GIS shapefiles of the city s Future Land Use. The
city of Casselberry directed the ECFRPC to download its most up to date FLU map from
the cities website. The future land use file was then used to populate the
parcel file, providing a completed and consistent future land use file for the
county. In any instance where the city and county showed a disagreement about
the future land use of a parcel, the city s future land use was utilized unless
a previous comprehensive plan had been adopted. For each of the previously
noted comprehensive plans that had been entered by the ECFRPC, the future land
for the parcel was compared to the comprehensive plan and depending on date of
last update was changed to reflect the comprehensive plan change.
The counties parcel file in many instances did not contain either right of way
locations or in some instances water bodies. As a final step the ECFRPC using
the county boundary, performed an erase against the completed parcel file in
order to locate any gaps occurring in the file. This erased file was then merged
back into the parcel file to give a complete contiguous GIS file. All values
added in through this process and not having been given a future land use
classification were then entered as unknown in the future land use table.
---------------Process_Step (Seminole):
Process_Description:
The Future Landuse file has been updated based on received comprehensive plans
with a Notice of Intent received at the East Central Florida Regional Planning
Council between the dates of July 1st through December 31st, 2008 (3Qt and 4Qt).
The changes made to the FLU files include updating both large and small
comprehensive plan changes. Amendments found "Not In Compliance" or not
receiving a notice of intent during the relative time period were not included
in this update. This file has undergone a QA/QC process by the ECFRPC.
---------------Process_Step (Seminole):
Process_Description:
The Future Landuse file has been updated based on received comprehensive plans
with a Notice of Intent received at the East Central Florida Regional Planning
Council between the dates of January 1st through June 30th, 2009 (1Qt and 2Qt).
The changes made to the FLU files include updating both large and small
comprehensive plan changes. Amendments found "Not In Compliance" or not
receiving a notice of intent during the relative time period were not included
in this update. This file has undergone a QA/QC process by the ECFRPC.
---------------Process_Step (Seminole):
Process_Description:
The Future Landuse file has been updated based on received comprehensive plans
with a Notice of Intent received at the East Central Florida Regional Planning
Council between the dates of July 1st through September 30th, 2009 (3Qt). The
changes made to the FLU files include updating both large and small
comprehensive plan changes. Amendments found "Not In Compliance" or not
receiving a notice of intent during the relative time period were not included
in this update. This file has undergone a QA/QC process by the ECFRPC.
---------------Process_Step (Seminole):
Process_Description:
The Future Landuse file has been updated based on received comprehensive plans
with a Notice of Intent received at the East Central Florida Regional Planning
Council between the dates of October 1st through December 31th, 2009 (4Qt). The
changes made to the FLU files include updating both large and small
comprehensive plan changes. Amendments found "Not In Compliance" or not
receiving a notice of intent during the relative time period were not included
in this update. This file has undergone a QA/QC process by the ECFRPC ONLY.
---------------Process_Step (Seminole):
Process_Description:
The Future Landuse file has been updated based on received comprehensive plans
with a Notice of Intent received at the East Central Florida Regional Planning
Council between the dates of January 1st through March 31th, 2010 (1Qt). The
changes made to the FLU files include updating both large and small
comprehensive plan changes. Amendments found "Not In Compliance" or not
receiving a notice of intent during the relative time period were not included
in this update. This file has undergone a QA/QC process by the ECFRPC ONLY.
Process_Contact:
Contact_Information:
Contact_Organization_Primary:
Contact_Organization: ecfrpc
Contact_Address:
Address_Type: mailing and physical address
Address:
309 cranes roost Blvd. Suite 2000
City: Altamonte Springs
State_or_Province: Florida
Postal_Code: 32701
Contact_Voice_Telephone: 407.262.7772
---------------Process_Step (Seminole):
Process_Description:
The Future Landuse file has been updated based on received comprehensive plans
with a Notice of Intent received at the East Central Florida Regional Planning
Council between the dates of April 1st through June 30th, 2010 (2Qt). The
changes made to the FLU files include updating both large and small
comprehensive plan changes. Amendments found "Not In Compliance" or not
receiving a notice of intent during the relative time period were not included
in this update. For this update there were 0 Large Scale Amendments and 10 Small
Scale Ordinances. This file has undergone a QA/QC process by the ECFRPC ONLY.
---------------Process_Step (Seminole):
Process_Description:
The Future Landuse file has been updated based on received comprehensive plans
with a Notice of Intent received at the East Central Florida Regional Planning
Council between the dates of July 1st through December 31st, 2010 (3QT & 4QT).
The changes made to the FLU files include updating both large and small
comprehensive plan changes. Amendments found "Not In Compliance" or not
receiving a notice of intent during the relative time period were not included
in this update. For this update there were 13 Large Scale Amendments and 12
Small Scale Ordinances. This file has undergone a QA/QC process by the ECFRPC
ONLY.
---------------Process_Step (Seminole):
Process_Description:
The Future Landuse file has been updated based on received comprehensive plans
with a Notice of Intent March 31th, 2011 (1stQT). The changes made to the FLU
files include updating both large and small comprehensive plan changes.
Amendments found "Not In Compliance" or not receiving a notice of intent during
the relative time period were not included in this update. For this update there
were 16 Large Scale Amendments and 4 Small Scale Ordinances. This file has
undergone a QA/QC process by the ECFRPC ONLY.
---------------Process_Step (Seminole):
Process_Description:
The Future Landuse file has been updated based on received comprehensive plans
with a Notice of Intent June 30th, 2011 (2ndQT). The changes made to the FLU
files include updating both large and small comprehensive plan changes.
Amendments found "Not In Compliance" or not receiving a notice of intent during
the relative time period were not included in this update. For this update there
were 1 Large Scale Amendments and 0 Small Scale Ordinances. This file has
undergone a QA/QC process by the ECFRPC ONLY.
Process Date:
---------------Process_Step (Sumter):
Process_Description:
Collected future land use maps and/or shapefiles from Sumter County, Bushnell,
Center Hill, Coleman, Webster and Wildwood.
Reprojected data sets into State Plane Florida East NAD 83, feet.
Created, cut and reclassified right-of-way based on adjacent future land use
polygons.
Reclassified future land use polygons based on generalized future land use
categories for Central Florida region. Sumter has a few areas that may need to
be considered for realignment in the future
Process_Contact:
Contact_Information:
Contact_Organization_Primary:
Contact_Organization: East Central Florida Regional Planning Council
Contact_Address:
Address_Type: mailing and physical address
Address:
309 Cranes Roost Blvd. Suite 2000
City: Altamonte Springs
State_or_Province: FL
Postal_Code: 32701
Country: US
Contact_Voice_Telephone: 407.262.7772
Contact_Facsimile_Telephone: 407.262.7788
---------------Process_Step (Sumter):
Process_Description:
UPDATING PROCESS DESCRIPTION
* Original data source: ECFRPC generalized Future Land Use file dated December
2004.
* Update by: (1) GMB Engineers and Planners, Inc. for East Central Florida
Regional Planning Council and (2) ECFRPC staff.
* Update processing time: From May 1, 2005 to September 1, 2005.
* Release date: September 5, 2005.
* Update status: First update of generalized Future Land Use GIS data for
District 5, Florida Department of Transportation. The shapefile name includes
the reference letter A or B corresponding to the first or second release for
data covering the specified calendar year.
* Document_ sources: All adopted comprehensive plan amendments received by the
ECFRPC from December 1, 2003 to March 31, 2005 for Brevard, Lake, Orange,
Osceola, Seminole and Volusia Counties. _ All adopted comprehensive plan
amendments received by the FDOT District Five planning office from December 1,
2003 to March 31, 2005 for Flagler, Marion and Sumter Counties. Adopted
comprehensive plan amendments found not in compliance by the Florida Department
of Community Affairs (DCA) were not included in the update.
* Processing methodology:
- First step: Major roads, local roads and parcel shape-files were used as _
reference points to locate Future Land Use polygons to be amended.
- Second step: Amendment descriptions were used to make changes on the
polygons using snapping and cutting tools available in ArcMap, to match adopted
ordinance. In case of multiple land use changes in one polygon, aerial
photographs were used as visual reference.
- Third step: Attribute table updated with the corresponding Original FLU /
Modified FLU and Generalized FLU information. DCA Number attribute populated
with the corresponding amendment number provided by DCA, when available. Date
Mod field updated with the date of the updating.
- Final step: General QA/QC of both geometry and attributes.
Metadata for ECFRPC LU Project.
Original data source: Downloaded from cfgis.org website, on May 1, 2005.
GIS tasks force: GMB Engineers and Planners, Inc.
For East Central Florida Regional Planning Council
Update processing time: From May 1, 2005 to August 5, 2005.
Release date: August 8, 2005.
Update statues: First update of Future Land Use GIS data for District 5, Florida
Department of Transportation.
Documents sources: All adopted comprehensive plan amendments received by the
ECFRPC from December 1, 2003 to March 31, 2005 for Brevard, Lake, Orange,
Osceola, Seminole and Volusia County. Used all adopted comprehensive plan
amendments received by the FDOT District Five planning office from December 1,
2003 to March 31, 2005 for Flagler, Marion and Sumter County. All comprehensive
plan amendments are in compliance by Florida Department of Community Affairs.
Processing methodology: Used ESRI ArcGIS 9.1 software to update the shapefiles.
First step, major roads, local roads and parcel shape-files were used as a
reference points to locate future land use polygons to be amended. Second step,
amendment descriptions were used to make changes on the polygons using cutting
tool in ArcMap, to match adopted ordinance. In case of multiple land use
changes in one polygon, aerial pictures were used as visual references. Final
step amended polygons were labeled with the corresponding East Central Florida
Planning Council and DCA number, when available.
Process_Contact:
Contact_Information:
Contact_Organization_Primary:
Contact_Organization: East Central Florida Regional Planning Council
Contact_Address:
Address_Type: mailing and physical address
Address:
631 N. Wymore Rd Suite 100
City: Maitland
State_or_Province: FL
Postal_Code: 32751
Country: US
Contact_Voice_Telephone: (407) 623-1075
Contact_Facsimile_Telephone: (407) 623-1084
Hours_of_Service: 8:30 am to 5:00 pm
---------------Process_Step (Sumter):
Process_Description:
New Updating Process Steps
Process steps for updating the Generalized FLU file has been modified.
Original file ECFRPC 2005 file.
Using list of adopted amendments from ECFRPC and the comprehensive plans,
updates to the FLU files were made which included polygon manipulation and/or
changing the ORIG, MOD and GEN FLU classifications. The most up to date parcel
layer (2005) were used for reference and snapping.
Once all updates as per adopted comprehensive plan amendments were completed,
the attribute table was QC'ed to ensure all classifications were consistent
based on FLU categories for each jurisdiction. This included ensuring that the
ORIG and MOD flu classifications were correctly spelled and abbreviated and the
correct GEN FLU was assigned for all categories. This was done by <DISSOLVING>
the attribute table based on JURIS, MOD, GEN, and ORIG FLU. Any discrepancies
were checked and corrected. Also, all fields were capitalized.
A query from DCA was obtained which included all adopted FLU amendments for the
9 counties which included jurisdiction, county, DCA number, Date Amendment was
received, number of amendments, large or small scale, notes and acres. Then the
query was compared to the ECFRPC list and the correct DCA numbers were given to
the appropriate ECFRPC numbers which were added to the "DCA Number" field in the
shape file.
Geometry of file was repaired.
---------------Process_Step (Sumter):
Process_Description:
Process steps for updating the Generalized FLU file has been modified.
Original file ECFRPC 2006 file.
Using list of adopted amendments from ECFRPC and the comprehensive plans,
updates to the FLU files were made which included polygon manipulation and/or
changing the ORIG, MOD and GEN FLU classifications. Most of the comprehensive
plans were obtained from the DCA Florida Papers data warehouse. The web address
is http://dcaenterprise.eoconline.org/. Those FLU amendments that were not
available on this website were obtained directly from the local jurisdiction.
The most up to date parcel layer (2005) was used for reference and snapping.
Once all updates as per adopted comprehensive plan amendments were completed,
the attribute table was QC'ed to ensure all classifications were consistent
based on FLU categories for each jurisdiction. This included ensuring that the
ORIG and MOD flu classifications were correctly spelled and abbreviated and the
correct GEN FLU was assigned for all categories. This was done by <DISSOLVING>
the attribute table based on JURIS, MOD, GEN, and ORIG FLU. Any discrepancies
were checked and corrected. Also, all fields were capitalized and the DATE_MOD
attributes were checked for format consistency.
A query from DCA was obtained which included all adopted FLU amendments for the
9 counties which included jurisdiction, county, DCA number, Date Amendment was
received, number of amendments, large or small scale, notes and acres. Then the
query was compared to the ECFRPC list and the correct DCA numbers were given to
the appropriate ECFRPC numbers which were added to the "DCA Number" field in the
shape file.
---------------Process_Step (Sumter):
Process_Description:
This update is relevant from Apr 1, 2007- June 30, 2007. The file has been
updated by using a list of the adopted amendments from DCA. Only amendments
found In Compliance were included in this update. The most up to date parcel
file was used to help in referencing the parcels that were undergoing a change
from the Future Land Use amendment changes. The jurisdictions were updated
separately. All queries received from DCA for the 9 county area included
jurisdiction, Mod FLU, DCA number, number of amendments, large or small scale,
notes and acres for the parcels in question. A GIS number was added later by
the ECFRPC.
---------------Process_Step (Sumter):
Process_Description:
This update is relevant from June 30, 2007- December 31, 2007 (3Qt and 4Qt).
The file has been updated by using a list of the adopted amendments from DCA.
Only amendments found In Compliance were included in this update. The most up
to date parcel file was used to help in referencing the parcels that were
undergoing a change from the Future Land Use amendment changes. The
jurisdictions were updated separately. All queries received from DCA for the 9
county area included jurisdiction, Mod FLU, DCA number, number of amendments,
large or small scale, notes and acres for the parcels in question. A GIS number
was added later by the ECFRPC.
Several Comprehensive plans were unable to be included in this update. They
include: Wildwood 07S01, o7S02,07S03,07S04,07S05,07S06.
---------------Process_Step (Sumter):
Process_Description:
This update is relevant from January 1, 2008 - April 1, 2008 (1Qt). The file
has been updated by using a list of the adopted amendments from DCA. Only
amendments found In Compliance were included in this update. The most up to
date parcel file was used to help in referencing the parcels that were
undergoing a change from the Future Land Use amendment changes. The
jurisdictions were updated separately. All queries received from DCA for the 9
county area included jurisdiction, Mod FLU, DCA number, number of amendments,
large or small scale, notes and acres for the parcels in question. A GIS number
was added later by the ECFRPC.
---------------Process_Step (Sumter):
Process_Description:
This update is relevant from April 1, 2008 to July 1, 2008 (2QT). The file
has been updated by using a list of the adopted amendments published by DCA.
Only amendments adopted and in compliance were included in this update. The
most up to date parcel file was used to help in referencing the parcels that
were undergoing a change from the Future Land Use amendment. Sumter County
queries from DCA included jurisdiction, Mod FLU, DCA number, number of
amendments, large or small scale, and land use change.
---------------Process_Step (Sumter):
Process_Description:
This update is relevant from July 1, 2008 to December 31st (3QT and 4QT).
The file has been updated by using a list of the adopted amendments published
by DCA. Only amendments adopted and in compliance were included in this update.
The most up to date parcel file was used to help in referencing the parcels that
were undergoing a change from the Future Land Use amendment. Sumter County
queries from DCA included jurisdiction, Mod FLU, DCA number, number of
amendments, large or small scale, and land use change.
---------------Process_Step (Sumter):
Process_Description:
Sumter County Future Land Use update. This update is relevant from January 1,
2009 through June 30, 2009 (1Qt and 2Qt). The file has been updated by using a
list of Notice of Intents from FDOT. Only amendments found In Compliance were
included in this update. The most up to date parcel file was used to help in
referencing the parcels that were undergoing a change from the Future Land Use
amendment changes. All queries received from FDOT included jurisdiction, Mod
FLU, genFLU, DCA number, large scale, and the actual land use change. File was
updated in August of 2009. This update did not include small scale changes as
this data is not available through FDOT.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation:
K:\PROGRAMS\GISWorking\OnGoingProjects\FLU\Sumter_FLU\Working\SumterCounty_GENFL
U_2008_3QT_and_4Qt
Process_Date: 20090901
Process_Time: 12165600
---------------Process_Step (Sumter):
Process_Description:
Sumter County Future Land Use update. This update is relevant from June 1, 2009
through September 30, 2009 (3Qt). There were no Notice of Intents from FDOT
filed for this time period, thus no updates were made to this dataset for the
relevant time period.
---------------Process_Step (Sumter):
Process_Description:
This update is relevant from October 1, 2009 through December 31, 2009 (4Qt).
There were no Notice of Intents from FDOT filed for this time period, thus no
updates were made to this dataset for the relevant time period.
---------------Process_Step (Sumter):
Process_Description:
This update is relevant from January 1, 2010 through March 31, 2010 (1Qt). There
were no Notice of Intents from FDOT filed for this time period, thus no updates
were made to this dataset for the relevant time period.
Process_Contact:
Contact_Information:
Contact_Organization_Primary:
Contact_Organization: ECFRPC
Contact_Address:
Address_Type: mailing and physical address
Address:
309 Cranes Roost Blvd Suite 2000
City: Altamonte Springs
State_or_Province: Florida
Postal_Code: 32701
Contact_Voice_Telephone: 407.262.7772
---------------Process_Step (Sumter):
Process_Description:
This update is relevant from April 1, 2010 through June 30, 2010 (2Qt). There
was 1 Large Scale Amendment and 0 Small Scale Amendments.
---------------Process_Step (Sumter):
Process_Description:
Sumter County Future Land Use update. This update is relevant from July 1, 2010
through December 31, 2010 (3Qt and 4Qt). The file has been updated by using a
list of Notice of Intents from FDOT. Only amendments found In Compliance were
included in this update. The most up to date parcel file was used to help in
referencing the parcels that were undergoing a change from the Future Land Use
amendment changes. All queries received from FDOT included jurisdiction, Mod
FLU, genFLU, DCA number, large scale, and the actual land use change. This
update included 1 large scale and 0 small scale changes. This file has
undergone a QA/QC process by the ECFRPC
---------------Process_Step (Sumter):
Process_Description:
This update is relevant from January 1, 2011 through March 31st, 2011 (1QT).
There were no Notice of Intents from FDOT filed for this time period, thus no
updates were made to this dataset for the relevant time period.
---------------Process_Step (Sumter):
Process_Description:
This update is relevant from April 1, 2011 through June 30st, 2011 (2QT). There
were no Notice of Intents from FDOT filed for this time period, thus no updates
were made to this dataset for the relevant time period.
Process Date:
---------------Process_Step (Volusia):
Process_Description:
For the 2010 3rd and 4th QT update, the Volusia County file has undergone a
realignment. The process began by collecting the most recent parcel file from the
Volusia County GIS Department, which was from 2010, then collecting the most
recent FLU shapefiles for Volusia County, the cities of Daytona Beach, Daytona
Beach Shores, DeBary, DeLand, Deltona, Edgewater, Holly Hill, Lake Helen, New
Smyrna Beach, Orange City, Ormond Beach, Ponce Inlet, Port Orange & South
Daytona . The FLU files for the cities of Oak Hill & Pierson were currently
under review and unavailable for this update. The parcel file serves as the base
and the parcels are filled in with the FLU designation for the county parcels
first. The cities follow. In any instance where the city and county showed a
disagreement about the future land use of a parcel, the city's future land use
was utilized. For future land use classification that do not follow parcel lines
the scale used to cut the shape of the designation was 1 inch = 0.05 miles.
Usually conservation designations, when necessary aerial imagery and jpg images
are used. The GEN_FLU field is populated based on the generalized future land
use categories for Central Florida region.
The file is then revised based on received comprehensive plans with a Notice of
Intent received at the East Central Florida Regional Planning Council between
the dates of July 31, 2010 through December 31, 2010 (3rd & 4th Qt). The changes
made to the FLU files include updating both large and small comprehensive plan
changes. Amendments found "Not In Compliance" or not receiving a notice of
intent during the relative time period were not included in this update. There
were 8 Large Scale and 7 Small Scale Amendments for this quarter. Amendments
whose map changes were already reflected in the file due to the currentness of
the source file were not changed. This file has undergone a QA/QC process by the
ECFRPC ONLY.
---------------Process_Step (Volusia):
Process_Description:
The Future Landuse file has been updated based on received comprehensive plans
with a Notice of Intent from January 1, 2011 through March 31th, 2011 (1stQT).
The changes made to the FLU files include updating both large and small
comprehensive plan changes. Amendments found "Not In Compliance" or not
receiving a notice of intent during the relative time period were not included
in this update. For this update there were 1 Large Scale Amendments and 2 Small
Scale Ordinances. This file has undergone a QA/QC process by the ECFRPC ONLY.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation:
K:\PROGRAMS\GISWorking\OnGoingProjects\FLU\Volusia_FLU\VolusiaCounty_GENFLU_2010
_3QT_4QT
Process_Date: 20110330
Process_Time: 14170700
---------------Process_Step (Volusia):
Process_Description:
The Future Landuse file has been updated based on received comprehensive plans
with a Notice of Intent from April 1, 2011 through June 30th, 2011 (2QT). The
changes made to the FLU files include updating both large and small
comprehensive plan changes. Amendments found "Not In Compliance" or not
receiving a notice of intent during the relative time period were not included
in this update. For this update there were 5 Large Scale Amendments and 1Small
Scale Ordinances. This file has undergone a QA/QC process by the ECFRPC ONLY.
Process Date:
GeoPlan downloaded this data from http://cfgis.org/ on 12/13/2011.
The data was downloaded in shapefile format. The original data was
projected in State Plane FL East - Nad83. The data was projected to
Albers HPGN.
The following 9 shapefiles were downloaded and merged:
BrevardCounty_GENFLU_2011_2QT.shp
FlaglerCounty_GENFLU_2011_2QT.shp
LakeCounty_GENFLU_2011_2QT.shp
MarionCounty_GENFLU_2011_2QT.shp
OrangeCounty_GENFLU_2011_2QT.shp
OsceolaCounty_GENFLU_2011_2QT.shp
SeminoleCounty_GENFLU_2011_2QT.shp
SumterCounty_GENFLU_2011_2QT.shp
VolusiaCounty_GENFLU_2011_2QT.shp
In order to get the schemas from all layers to match for merge operation, the following changes were made:
-changed ORG_FLU to ORIG_FLU - Lake, Seminole, Volusia
-added COUNTY field and calced with fips code:
Seminole: 117
Volusia: 127
-deleted ORIG_FID from: Osceola, Volusia
In order not to lose original metadata, the process steps from each original metadata
were copied to an individual process step in the new merged dataset.
-Ran repair geometry multiple times with ArcGIS 9.3.1
-Added DESCRIPT field based on: GEN_FLU
-Added FGDLAQDATE based on date data downloaded
-Named new layer ecfrpc_genflu_2011
Process Date: 20120106
|