FLORIDA GEOGRAPHIC DATA LIBRARY DOCUMENTATION

TITLE: FDOT EXISTING AND PROPOSED WILDLIFE CROSSINGS IN FLORIDA - 2009

Geodataset Name:       WILDLIFEXING_JUL09
Geodataset Type:       SHAPEFILE
Geodataset Feature:    Point
Feature Count:         175
GENERAL DESCRIPTION:
This dataset contains Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) existing and proposed wildlife crossings in the State of Florida. Wildlife crossings serve as connections between landscapes divided by roadways. These structures play a critical role in decreasing the barrier effect of roadways and increasing the permeability of roads for wildlife. Several types of crossings have been constructed throughout the state of Florida including culverts, underpasses, overpasses, and expanded bridges. Wildlife crossings that consist of overpass or underpass systems appear to have the most effective designs for accommodating the needs of a broad range of wildlife. Crossings coupled with barrier fencing may increase effectiveness and reduce the amount of road mortality.
DATA SOURCE(S):                    Florida Department of Transportation
SCALE OF ORIGINAL SOURCE MAPS:     Unknown
GEODATASET EXTENT:                 State of Florida
PUBLICATION DATE: 20090728 TIME PERIOD OF CONTENT: 20090728 DOWNLOAD LINK: http://www.fgdl.org/metadataexplorer/explorer.jsp

FEATURE ATTRIBUTE TABLES:

Datafile Name: WILDLIFEXING_JUL09.DBF
ITEM NAME WIDTH TYPE
OBJECTID
4 OID
Shape
4 Geometry
XINGNUM
7 String
XINGTYPE
15 String
DOTNAME
80 String
FDOTDSCT
1 String
LATIT
8 Double
LONGIT
8 Double
FDOTTRNU
50 String
CNTYNAME
50 String
HIGHWAY
50 String
LOCATION
200 String
BRDGNUM
50 String
TGTSPECI
50 String
XINGSIZE
50 String
XINGSHP
90 String
EXCLUDEV
254 String
AGNCYREQ
50 String
CONCOST
50 String
COMPDATE
50 String
PLANSET
50 String
RPTS
180 String
MONITORD
100 String
ROADWAY
8 String
PTDMI
8 Double
DESCRIPT
85 String
FGDLAQDATE
36 Date
AUTOID
4 Integer

FEATURE ATTRIBUTE TABLES CODES AND VALUES:

Item
Item Description
OBJECTID Internal feature number.

Shape Feature geometry.

XINGNUM Crossing Identification Number.

XINGTYPE Crossing Status Type.

DOTNAME FDOT Name / FM Number.

FDOTDSCT FDOT District Number.

LATIT Latitude

LONGIT Longitude

FDOTTRNU Not Defined By Source.

CNTYNAME County Name.

HIGHWAY Highway Name.

LOCATION Location written discription.

BRDGNUM Bridge Number.

TGTSPECI Target Species.

XINGSIZE Crossing Size.

XINGSHP Crossing Shape.

EXCLUDEV Crossing Exclusionary Devices.

AGNCYREQ Agency Requiring.

CONCOST Construction Cost.

COMPDATE Completion Date.

PLANSET Not Defined By Source.

RPTS Not Defined By Source.

MONITORD Monitored Status.

ROADWAY RCI Section.

PTDMI RCI Milepost.

DESCRIPT Based on the Fields DOTNAME and XINGNUM.

FGDLAQDATE Date FGDL acquired the data from the Source.

AUTOID Unique ID added by GeoPlan


USER NOTES:
This data is provided 'as is'. GeoPlan relied on the integrity
of the original data layer's topology
This data is provided 'as is' by GeoPlan and is complete to our
knowledge.
GeoPlan relied on the integrity of the attribute information within
the original data.
TYPES OF WILDLIFE CROSSINGS

Underpasses and Culverts
Underpasses serve as corridors that connect spatially separated habitats and 
enhance the efficacy of wildlife movement. Wildlife underpasses are typically 20 
feet long or greater. Larger than most upland culverts, underpasses provide 
relatively unconfined passage for some wildlife species.  Animals pass under an 
intersecting roadway through a bridge which forms part of the roadway. If sized 
appropriately, wildlife underpasses provide adequate air flow and light. Also, 
wildlife underpasses with open medians provide a certain amount of intermediate 
habitat for small mammals, reptiles, and amphibians. In some cases, very large 
culverts also serve as underpasses.

Culverts can be modified to accommodate wildlife passage across roadways. 
Box culverts have four sides, including a bottom, and may be arranged in a 
horizontal series of small culverts or multiple chambers. Bottomless culverts consist
of square or rectangular corrugated metal pipe culverts with a natural surface 
bottom. Oversized culverts may be used to accommodate wildlife passage of 
streams and small rivers.

Overpass Structures
More recently, overpass structures, also called ecoducts or green bridges, have 
been used to facilitate passage for a wide range of species. These structures 
provide relatively unconfined passage for wildlife while simultaneously providing 
plenty of light and air movement; however, prolonged exposure may lead to 
desiccation for some amphibian species.

Expanded Bridges
Expanded bridges that provide upland travel corridors adjacent to waterways 
provide passage for many terrestrial wildlife species as well as aquatic species that 
utilize stream corridors for travel. There are a variety of expanded bridges including 
single-span bridges, multi-span bridges, viaducts, and causeways. A single-span 
bridge, also known as an open-span bridge, consists of a structure that rests on 
abutments with no intermediate support columns. A multi-span bridge is similar, but 
has one or more intermediate support columns between the abutments. A viaduct 
is also known as a multi-span bridge but provides increased length to the bridge 
structure. A causeway is a form of viaduct that is usually constructed over 
wetlands.

Fencing
The most effective way to prevent wildlife-vehicular collisions is to utilize a 
combination of fencing and crossings. The use of animal fencing is usually 
necessary for wildlife crossings to be effective. Typically, wildlife fencing is 
installed on both sides of the roadway in a winged pattern connected to each end
of a crossing structure. Animals that encounter the fence will travel along it and 
eventually be guided to the passageway system as opposed to entering the 
roadway. If an animal may become trapped on the roadway, fencing may also 
include one-way gates to provide an escape route through the fence and away 
from roadway. Fencing is a cost-effective solution for protecting wildlife from 
vehicular traffic on roadways. However, it is often not aesthetically pleasing to the 
public and may lead to highly fragmented and isolated wildlife populations if used 
in the absence wildlife crossings. Where possible, fencing is installed in and 
around existing vegetative cover to minimize the visual impact of the fencing.

District 1 Proposed Wildlife Crossings Design and Coordination Report.pdf

The data was created to serve as base information for use in GIS systems 
for a variety of planning and analytical purposes.

This data is provided 'as is' and its horizontal positional accuracy
has not been verified by GeoPlan

This data is provided 'as is' and its vertical positional accuracy
has not been verified by GeoPlan

NONE

The Florida Geographic Data Library is a collection of Geospatial Data
compiled by the University of Florida GeoPlan Center with support from
the Florida Department of Transportation. GIS data available in FGDL is
collected from various state, federal, and other agencies (data sources)
who are data stewards, producers, or publishers. The data available in
FGDL may not be the most current version of the data offered by the
data source. University of Florida GeoPlan Center makes no guarantees
about the currentness of the data and suggests that data users check
with the data source to see if more recent versions of the data exist.

Furthermore, the GIS data available in the FGDL are provided 'as is'.
The University of Florida GeoPlan Center makes no warranties, guaranties
or representations as to the truth, accuracy or completeness of the data
provided by the data sources. The University of Florida GeoPlan Center
makes no representations or warranties about the quality or suitability
of the materials, either expressly or implied, including but not limited
to any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular
purpose, or non-infringement. The University of Florida GeoPlan Center
shall not be liable for any damages suffered as a result of using,
modifying, contributing or distributing the materials.

A note about data scale: 

Scale is an important factor in data usage.  Certain scale datasets
are not suitable for some project, analysis, or modeling purposes.
Please be sure you are using the best available data. 

1:24000 scale datasets are recommended for projects that are at the
county level.
1:24000 data should NOT be used for high accuracy base mapping such
as property parcel boundaries.
1:100000 scale datasets are recommended for projects that are at the
multi-county or regional level.
1:125000 scale datasets are recommended for projects that are at the
regional or state level or larger.

Vector datasets with no defined scale or accuracy should be
considered suspect. Make sure you are familiar with your data
before using it for projects or analysis. Every effort has been
made to supply the user with data documentation. For additional
information, see the References section and the Data Source Contact
section of this documentation. For more information regarding
scale and accuracy, see our webpage at:
http://geoplan.ufl.edu/education.html

REFERENCES:
Florida Department of Transportation
Wildlife Crossing Guidelines
http://www.dot.state.fl.us/emo/pubs/APPROVED-Wildlife%20Crossing%20Guidelines3-13.pdf

District 1 Proposed Wildlife Crossings Design and Coordination Report.pdf

DATA LINEAGE SUMMARY:
Kisinger Campo & Associates Corp. developed a GIS base map of existing
FDOT wildlife crossings with data attached (e.g., size, type, etc.).

Wildlife Crossing GIS Database

Mark Easley
Sr. Project Manager
Kisinger Campo & Associates Corp.
201 N. Franklin Street, Suite 400
Tampa, FL  33602
(813) 871-5331 Ext. 4144
http://www.kisingercampo.com/CorporateOffice.html
Process Date: 20090417

The GeoPlan Center received via email the statewide wildlife crossings data layer from the Florida Department of Transportation (http://www.dot.state.fl.us/) on February 18th, 2011. Wildlife_Xings.zip The Wildlife_Xings.zip contained the following layer, WildlifeXing.shp, and it was in the NAD_1983_UTM_Zone_17N projection. This layer was then reprojected to the FGDL albers projection NAD83 HARN. The layer was renamed to wildlifexing_jul09.shp A DESCRIPT field was then added based on DOTNAME and XINGNUM. A FGDLAQDATE field was also added and populated. All fields were UPPER Cased. Process Date: 20110218
Data imported to ArcSDE and exported as a shapefile. Process Date: 20110303
MAP PROJECTION PARAMETERS:

Projection                          ALBERS
Datum                               HPGN
Units                               METERS
Spheroid                            GRS1980
1st Standard Parallel               24  0  0.000
2nd Standard Parallel               31 30  0.000
Central Meridian                   -84 00  0.000
Latitude of Projection's Origin     24  0  0.000
False Easting (meters)              400000.00000
False Northing (meters)             0.00000

DATA SOURCE CONTACT (S):

Name:
Abbr. Name:
Address:


Phone:

Web site:
E-mail:
Contact Person:
         Phone:
        E-mail:
Florida Department of Transportation
FDOT
605 Suwannee St MS 37
Tallahassee, FL
32399-0450
850-414-4447

http://www.dot.state.fl.us/emo/pubs/APPROVED-Wildlife%20Crossing%20Guidelines3-13.pdf emo@dot.state.fl.us

FGDL CONTACT:
Name:                   FLORIDA GEOGRAPHIC DATA LIBRARY
Abbr. Name:             FGDL
Address:                Florida Geographic Data Library
                        431 Architecture Building
                        PO Box 115706
                        Gainesville, FL  32611-5706
Web site:               http://www.fgdl.org

Contact FGDL: 

      Technical Support:	        http://www.fgdl.org/fgdlfeed.html
      FGDL Frequently Asked Questions:  http://www.fgdl.org/fgdlfaq.html
      FGDL Mailing Lists:		http://www.fgdl.org/fgdl-l.html
      For FGDL Software:                http://www.fgdl.org/software.html